HOME   WISE Uranium Project   >   Mining & Milling   >   Issues   >   New Uranium Mining Projects - North America   >

New Uranium Mining Projects - Greenland   flag

(last updated 3 Aug 2023)

General · Kuannersuit · Kvanefjeld

> See also Issues for: Operating Mines · Decommissioning Projects · Legislation & Regulations
> See also Data for: Deposits, Proposed and Active Mines · Old Mines and Decommissioning

The following companies are performing uranium prospection and/or exploration in Greenland: Prime Minerals Ltd , Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd , Ram Resources Ltd , TANBREEZ Mining Greenland A/S , Bluejay Mining plc , Orano

Uranium mining in Greenland is being opposed by Urani Naamik , Urani Naamik-Nuuk , NOAH .

> See also: Greenland's zero-tolerance uranium policy



Greenland government's new coalition partner Siumut won't immediately seek changes to uranium ban

Greenland's social democratic Siumut party, part of a new government coalition, will not immediately seek changes to the country's ban on uranium mining, its chairman Erik Jensen said on Monday (Apr. 4).
Greenland's ruling left-wing Inuit Ataqatigiit party (IA) on Monday announced a government coalition, with Siumut replacing the pro-independence Naleraq party. IA came to power a year ago on a strong environmental stance and vowing to combat acute social issues, dethroning the Siumut party, which had led every government except one since 1979. (Reuters Apr. 4, 2022)

Greenland Parliament approves bill prohibiting uranium exploration and mining

> View here (Nov. 9, 2021)

Orano refrains from launching uranium exploration campaign in Greenland

The French nuclear group Orano will not launch an exploration campaign to search for uranium in Greenland despite the permits it has, following the change of majority in the Danish autonomous territory.
"We respect the orientation envisaged by the newly appointed coalition, and will therefore not launch exploration work for uranium in Greenland in this context," a company spokesperson told AFP. (Le Figaro May 17, 2021)

Two parties opposed to Kvanefjeld mining project form government coalition in Greenland

Greenland's left-wing Inuit Ataqatigiit party (IA), which has pledged to oppose a large rare-earth mining project, announced a new government coalition on Friday (Apr. 16), as it reiterated its strong environmental stance and vowed to combat acute social issues.
IA formed a coalition with pro-independence party Naleraq to control a total 16 seats in the 31-seat parliament. Liberal-conservative unionist party Atassut is supporting the coalition and has two seats in parliament. (Reuters Apr. 16, 2021)

Party opposing Kvanefjeld mining project wins Greenland election

Greenland's main opposition party, which opposes a rare earth mining project, has become the biggest in parliament after securing more than a third of votes in a snap election.
The election result, closely watched by international mining companies wanting to exploit Greenland's vast untapped minerals resources, casts doubt on a mining complex at Kvanefjeld in the south of the Arctic island which holds one of the world’s biggest deposits of rare earth metals.
With nearly all votes counted, the left-wing Inuit Ataqatigiit (IA) party took 37% of votes, unseating the ruling social democratic Siumut party which secured 29% of votes, according to official results. (Reuters Apr. 7, 2021)

Greenland calls election after government breaks up over Kvanefjeld mine dispute

Greenland's government called a national election late on Tuesday (Feb. 16) after parliament threatened it with a no-confidence vote, just over a week after a junior party left the ruling coalition in a dispute over a mining project.
The main governing Siumut party has been riven by a dispute over Kvanefjeld, a rare earth and uranium open-pit mining project that has been running for almost 15 years. Citing that dispute, the Democrats left the coalition on Feb. 8, leaving the government short of a parliamentary majority. The election has been scheduled for April 6.
According to a January survey, opposition party Inuit Ataqatigiit (IA), which is opposed to the mining project, has become the largest party since the last election in 2018, and is set to win 13 out of 31 seats in parliament, over Siumut's nine. (Reuters Feb. 17, 2021)

137 environmental organizations sign petition against large-scale mining in Greenland

137 environmental organizations from around the world call on Greenlandic and Danish politicians as well as the EU to suspend all large-scale mining and oil extraction in Greenland to protect the Arctic environment. In return, Greenland should be awarded compensation for lost earnings, it reads.
Urani Naamik, Nuup Kangerluata Ikinngutai, World Heritage Watch, the Center for Renewable Energy, the European Environmental Bureau and Noah have taken the initiative for the declaration and the collection of signatures, which includes a large number of NGOs from mine-active countries such as Kazakhstan, China, Australia, Russia, Africa, Japan and France. (Sermitsiaq Feb. 12, 2021)

Orano obtains two exploration permits for uranium in Greenland

[On Jan. 14, 2021,] Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland] has granted the French company Orano SA two exploration permits for uranium.
The French company Orano Mining Limited has just reserved two areas in southwest and southeast Greenland to look for uranium. However, the permits are granted on special terms, where the company cannot automatically expect to obtain an exploitation permit.
The one area where uranium mining will take place is 1,042 square kilometers north of Arsuk and Kangiinnguiet and north of Narsarsuaq. The second area is 2,485 square kilometers and consists of two sub-areas around the Ilulileq and Paatsusoq fjords and the Kangerlussuatsiaq fjord, respectively.
Unlike the Kvanefjeld project, Orano's exploration areas are much further away from inhabited areas. (Sermitsiaq Jan. 27, 2021)

Orano to join companies exploring for uranium in Greenland

After recently Bluejay Mining Plc was awarded two exploration licenses (MEL 2020/03 and 2020/22) for uranium and other metals in an area of 2,025 square kilometers around Prince Christian Sund ("to be known as the Thunderstone Project"), it is now reported that the French uranium company Orano has applied for permission to explore an area covering 2,486 square kilometers. (Bluejay Mining Apr. 15, 2020, Sermitsiaq May 3, 2020)

China General Nuclear and Cameco to cooperate on uranium exploration in Greenland

China General Nuclear (CGN) announced it has signed an agreement with Canadian uranium mining company Cameco to further expand and deepen their cooperation in the joint development of uranium resources.
The agreement was signed on 9 May by CGN chairman He Yu and Cameco president and CEO Tim Gitzel, the Chinese company said yesterday (May 12). Under the agreement, the two companies will cooperate in uranium exploration projects in Greenland, CGN said. (WNN May 13, 2016)

Greenlandic minister woos Chinese investment into mining projects

The Greenland government hopes to attract Chinese investment to its mining industry, an official from the world's largest island said on Tuesday (Nov. 5). Jens-Erik Kirkegaard, Greenland's Minister of Industry and Minerals, said the island has large amounts of mineral resources while China's economic development needs such resources to maintain growth. (China Daily Nov. 6, 2013)

Southern Greenland: uranium mining vs. World Heritage

Greenland's Home Rule government is facing a difficult decision these days. It must decide whether it wants to place southern Greenland on UNESCO's World Heritage list or allow uranium mining. MPs are pushing for Southern Greenland to be designated by UNESCO for its 1000 years of agriculture dating back to the time of Eric the Red. But mining for the wealth of minerals - including Uranium - in the area would preclude that designation. Large areas around Narsaq and Qaqortoq were included in the World Heritage bid, which unleashed protests from interested parties because the Raw Materials Directorate had already issued numerous drilling licences within those areas. Now the Home Rule government is proposing that only five small 'islands' be included as World Heritage site possibilities to avoid the mining conflict. (Sermitsiaq avis July 4, 2008)


Kvanefjeld (Kuannersuit) rare earth - uranium project

Exploration licence El 2010/02

> View deposit info

Government of Greenland issues draft refusal of mining for minerals other than uranium at Kvanefjeld: On Aug. 3, 2023, Energy Transition Minerals Ltd announced that a draft decision on the amended exploitation application has been received from Greenland's Ministry of Mineral Resources and Justice. The draft decision states "The Government of Greenland refuses the application of 16 December 2022 for the alternative exploitation licence for the Kuannersuit project".
On 16 December 2022, the Company lodged an amendment to the existing application for an exploitation licence for the Kvanefjeld project. The amended application was for an alternative development scenario, where the Company would only exploit rare earth elements, zinc and fluorspar. Uranium would be removed as an impurity, safely treated and stored in the tailings facility.

Company files arbitration claim over refusal of extraction permit for Kvanefjeld mine project On July 20, 2023, Energy Transition Minerals Ltd announced that it has filed a Statement of Claim with an arbitral tribunal seated in Copenhagen. The claim pertains to its dispute with the Governments of Greenland and Denmark regarding the company's rights under its current exploration licence for the Kvanefjeld project.
The company provisionally quantifies its damages claim at USD 7.5 billion, plus USD 4 billion in pre-award interest.

Government of Greenland refuses exploitation licence application for Kvanfejeld mine project: On June 2, 2023, Energy Transition Minerals Ltd informed that it has received a letter from the Greenland Authorities which states that "the Government of Greenland refuses the application dated 17 June 2019 for an exploitation licence for the Kuannersuit project."
The rejection of the exploitation licence application follows on from the Government of Greenland's previous draft decision to refuse and exploitation licence for Kvanefjeld.

Company reportedly claims US$ 2.2 billion compensation for refusal of extraction permit for Kvanefjeld mine project: The Danish newspaper Politiken reports that the compensation claim from the mining company is as much as DKK 15 billion [US$ 2.2 billion], and that Denmark will pay a third of the costs for lawyers in the case.
The dispute is about Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland] having stopped the Kuannersuit mining project after reintroducing zero tolerance against uranium extraction. The Australian company believes that Naalakkersuisut's decision to stop the project is a breach of the rules. (Sermitsiaq May 11, 2023)

Government of Greenland preparing final refusal of extraction permit for Kvanefjeld mine project: Energy Transition Minerals has submitted a consultation response to Naalakkersuisut's [Government of Greenland] draft refusal of an extraction permit at Kuannersuit. In this way, the final touches can be put on a final refusal, which the company, however, has one year to appeal against. (Sermitsiaq Mar. 28, 2023)

Company adds "alternative development scenario" for recovery of non-uranium minerals only to Kvanefjeld mining license application: On Dec. 20, 2022, Energy Transition Minerals Ltd announced that, on 16 December 2022, it submitted an amendment to its existing application for an exploitation licence for the Kvanefjeld Project in Greenland to Mineral Resource Authority. The amendment supplements the Company's existing application to include an alternative development scenario for which an exploitation licence may be granted for the Kvanefjeld Project. Specifically, under the alternative development scenario the Company will exploit only rare earth elements, zinc and fluorspar (and not uranium). Under the alternative development scenario, rather than being exploited, uranium will be removed as an impurity and safely treated and stored in the tailings facility.

Old mine tunnels at Kvanefjeld to be examined and securely closed: Inuit Ataqatigiit's Mariane Paviasen has asked a series of questions about what Naalakkersuisut intends to do with the old mine entrances at Kuannersuit. Among other things, she wants an update on whether the mine waste standing by the mine tunnel can pose a health hazard to people, as well as what should happen with a tunnel opening, which according to Paviasen is open.
Naalakkersuisut explains that the two tunnels at Kuannersuit were both excavated in the 1970s during the state's uranium exploration in connection with the Risø project: [...]
- The Department for Raw Materials and the Justice Area wants to inspect the conditions first, but immediately it would make sense in terms of security to have both entrances properly closed, which the department will initiate and ensure is done as soon as possible. (Sermitsiaq Nov. 9, 2022)

Government of Greenland sends draft refusal of mining permit at Kvanefjeld to Greenland Minerals: Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland] has sent a draft refusal for a mining permit at Kuannersuit to Greenland Minerals for consultation. The company is far from satisfied with the progress of the process, while at the same time they are trying to stack up an arbitration against the state and the self-government. (Sermitsiaq July 27, 2022)


Kvanefjeld arbitration proceedings

Kvanefjeld arbitration proceedings are intended to delay time: The Australian company in Kuannersuit [Greenland Minerals Ltd., which recently changed its name to Energy Transition Minerals Ltd. ] has an interest in the arbitration case against Greenland's Self-Government and the Danish State being dragged out until there is possibly another political majority in Greenland. This is according to the head of the Department for Raw Materials, Jørgen T. Hammeken-Holm. (Sermitsiaq Nov. 26, 2022)

Arbitration Tribunal declines to grant interim orders against Greenland over Kvanefjeld dispute: On Sep. 26, 2022, Greenland Minerals Limited announced that the Arbitration Tribunal has issued an Interim Award dismissing the Company's request for interim measures against the Greenland Government to maintain the status quo and ensure that the legal process for determination of the Company's exploitation licence application is respected while the arbitration is ongoing in Copenhagen.

Greenland Minerals Ltd requests arbitration proceedings over impact of uranium ban on Kvanefjeld mine project: Greenland Minerals Ltd [GGG] has requested arbitration proceedings over the effect of the uranium ban (passed by the Greenland Parliament) on the Kvanefjeld rare earth-uranium mine project.
"GGG's intention is to proceed with the Project by obtaining binding confirmation that the new legislation has no effect on the Company's existing exploration licence, including the provision entitling the Company to an exploitation licence. Alternatively, GGG will seek compensation and damages for expropriation" (Greenland Minerals Ltd Mar. 23, 2022)
> Download: Request for Arbitration document , March 22, 2022 (493kB PDF)


Greenland's uranium ban applies to Kvanefjeld mine project, government says: According to the terms of the Act [Greenland Parliament Act No. 20 to ban uranium prospecting, exploration and exploitation], it is to apply to licences issued after its effective date (2 December 2021). GGG's [Greenland Minerals Ltd's] current exploration licence El 2010/02 was issued before this date and is the basis of the Company's application for an exploitation licence for the Kvanefjeld project.
However, the Department [Department of Minerals Resources and Justice] stated granting of an exploitation licence would be considered a separate, new licence, and therefore subject to the new Act. Based on this interpretation, the Company's exploitation licence application would not be granted, based on its current development proposal for Kvanefjeld. (Greenland Minerals Ltd Dec. 20, 2021)

Government policy on compensation of mining companies for uranium ban remains secret: A key question in the debate over the uranium ban has been whether the Autonomous Government risks having to pay compensation to companies that have spent millions of kroner on exploration and now face the prospect of being denied mining permits because of the new ban.
The issue will only be finally settled in court if a mineral company chooses to take the government to court. The government has prepared for that situation, should it happen.
In a reply to Demokraatit chairman Jens-Frederik Nielsen, minister for raw materials, Naaja H. Nathanielsen (IA), states that legal assessments of the uranium ban have been carried out by the law firm Poul Schmith, but that the assessments will not be released on the grounds that they may be used in a future court case. (Sermitsiaq Dec. 2, 2021)

International experts against disposal of tailings from Kvanefjeld mine in Taseq Lake: Investigative journalists of Danwatch have contacted a number of international mine waste experts, all of whom are very skeptical about the proposed wet tailings disposal scheme for the Kvanefjeld mine at Taseq Lake. This scheme presents hazards in the long term, which could only be avoided by placing the tailings back in the mined-out pit.
> View: Danwatch Release Mar. 20, 2021 · Background report Mar. 20, 2021 (in Danish)

The anachronistic proposal for a wet tailings disposal scheme at the Kvanefjeld (Kuannersuit) rare earths / uranium mine: In the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for its Kvanefjeld (Kuannersuit) mine project, Greenland Minerals Ltd (GML) presents its decision to select a wet disposal scheme for the tailings arising from the planned processing of local ores for their rare-earths and uranium contents. The tailings, moreover, are to be covered by a water layer in the long term.
This proposal is absolutely anachronistic, given the troubling history of major tailings dam failures, as documented here and at World Mine Tailings Failures : wet-disposed tailings are mechanically unstable and tailings dams holding them are subject to sudden failure, often causing serious destruction and loss of lives.
> Download full text of analysis: The anachronistic proposal for a wet tailings disposal scheme at the Kvanefjeld (Kuannersuit) rare earths / uranium mine in Greenland, Feb. 11, 2021 (115kB PDF)
[Moreover, this reminds one of the situation at the Husab mine in Namibia: Two weeks, after China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding Corp. acquired the project's Australian developer Extract Resources Ltd in April 2012, the company announced to replace the proposed dry tailings management scheme for the mine by a wet scheme in a last-minute U-turn.]

Local geologist criticizes EIA report for Kvanefjeld rare earths - uranium mine project: Ole Christiansen, geologist and advisor to the Municipality of Kujalleq in the area of raw materials, is disappointed with Greenland Minerals' EIA [Environmental Impact Assessment] report and the technical background analyzes, which have been going on for many years. Therefore, he has also warned the municipality about several of the technical conditions that he believes are problematic for the environment and people. [...]
- I think overall that it is problematic that it is the mining company that leads the way in the statement, and not an independent consultant. I am aware that independent consultants such as Orbicon and GHD have prepared parts of the report, but the company has been responsible for the merger, and thus the report loses some of its credibility. Because when you put the wolf to guard musk oxen, there is a risk that it does not go as planned, says Ole Christiansen. [...]

Ole Christiansen still believes that there are several unanswered questions in the project. For example, he believes that data of significance to the environment is only based on a bulk sample taken from the ore heap that Risø [National Laboratory] laid in the valley floor in 1979-80.
- It is not "best international" practice and is not accepted by either the Australian JORC ("Joint Ore Reserve Committee") or Canadian National Instruments. For the sample is not representative of the occurrence. The mining model and the environmental impact are distorted. A large part of the soluble minerals are dissolved over the 30-40 years where the heap has been lying and taking a bath in 1200 millimeters of precipitation annually. The sample is also not representative, and it gives, first and foremost, a distortion of the environmentally most difficult problem; the fluorine content.
- The mining project's production figures for 'fluorspar' (CaF) also contain only a part of the fluorine contained. This is confirmed by Risø's analysis of the fluorine content of the ore at 9600 ppm F. That is 1 percent, most of which is in the easily soluble Villaumite. And 1 percent of 3 million tons is still 30,000 tons F, of which the mine expects to "catch" a fraction. The rest we must therefore assume goes in the aquatic environment. That is a problem, Ole Christiansen explains to Sermitsiaq.

Ole Christiansen also does not believe that the handling of thorium is properly elucidated:
- Thorium is only mentioned in passing, and the most important issues with this (and the associated decay products) are only treated cursorily. The ore reserve of 108 million tonnes, which is to be mined over the first 37 years, contains 86,000 tonnes of thorium. According to Risø, [...] most of the thorium will end up in the concentrate. Where does this thorium end up? There are customers for the semi-finished products of rare earths and for the uranium concentrate, but the customers do not want the products to be contaminated with thorium, and according to the mining company, thorium is not interesting either "as it is not a salable product".
- I am worried that if you uncritically throw yourself into this project, you risk being left with a serious problem in a few years. For what do we do when the dam in 30 years bursts due to the millions of liters of waste including the highly toxic fluoride deposited in the lake? If we look around the world for a moment, then unfortunately there are many examples of bankrupt mining companies leaving deeply polluted areas. Who ends up with the bill? Greenland risks doing this. (Sermitsiaq Feb. 6, 2021 - emphasis added)

Geologist raises questions about Kvanefjeld rare earths - uranium mine project: Anton Chakhmouradian , a professor of geology at the University of Manitoba and an expert on rare earth elements, said Greenlanders should take the company’s claims about the abundance of the strategic rare earth minerals in Kuannersuit and their ability to extract them with a grain of salt. Chakhmouradian said Greenlanders should also start asking tough questions about a radioactive byproduct of the mining operation that has the potential to cause serious environmental damage for millenia.
The principal ore mineral at Kvanefjeld is called steenstrupine . "Not only it is a structurally complex mix of 11 different elements -- even if we exclude 'minor' elements, like calcium, aluminium and niobium, which are also present, but at lower levels -- it is also extremely variable chemically on a microscale," Chakhmouradian said. This complex metallurgy makes it extremely difficult to extract the rare earth elements present in the ore at an industrial scale, he said. Greenland Minerals claims that its rare earth recovery technology has been tested at the BTMR laboratories in China in 2020, overseen by rare earth specialists Shenghe Resources Holding Co Ltd., one of the leading rare earth producers in China. But Chakhmouradian said it's one thing to be able to extract minerals in a laboratory setting and a completely different thing to upscale this process on an industrial and a commercially viable scale. There is also the fact that mining and processing such a complex ore would require tremendous resources and infrastructure that would be extremely expensive given how remote the mine is, Chakhmouradian said. "I feel very, very, very sceptical," Chakhmouradian said. "If you add all those things together: the absence of a well-demonstrated technology that would work on a major industrial scale, low grades, very difficult mineralogy, remoteness and the fifth problem is radioactivity."
Chakhmouradian says what makes him even more sceptical about the proposed project is the lack of any discussion about a little-known radioactive material contained in these ores. "Steenstrupine has something like two per cent of thorium," he said, "and thorium is very radioactive." There is nothing in the company's spreadsheets and data sheets about thorium, Chakhmouradian said. "Yes, uranium is their asset, they're planning to extract uranium alongside rare earths but there is nothing on thorium and that makes me very-very suspicious," Chakhmouradian said. Basic calculations show that for each 25,000 tons of rare earth elements produced annually, the mining company will need to dispose of 3,000 tons of highly radioactive thorium, Chakhmouradian said. "What are they going to do with this thorium? Where are they going to dump it?" Chakhmouradian said. "They make no clear comments or statements as to what is going to happen to all this radioactive waste." (Radio Canada Jan. 8, 2021 - emphasis added)


Public consultation on Environmental Impact Assessment and Social Impact Assessment for Kvanefjeld mine project

Greenland government holds new public hearings on Kvanefjeld rare earths / uranium mine project, this time with some government officials: From 23 to 28 August, it is planned to hold consultation meetings with Greenland Minerals, independent experts and the Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland], which will send three members to South Greenland in connection with the much-discussed Kvanefjeld project.
[...] the law requires that the consultation meetings be conducted despite the fact that a political majority has wanted to prevent the extraction of radioactive minerals and elements in Greenland. (Sermitsiaq Aug. 10, 2021)
However: "Due to the current covid19-situation in Greenland, the Minister for Health [!], Kirsten L. Fencker, is unable to attend the meetings in person."
> Access: Consultation page

The Ministry of Raw Materials has budgeted expenses of DKK 700,000 [EUR 94,119] to hold citizen meetings about Kuannersuit in South Greenland, which are scheduled for 23-28 August. The expenses are this time borne by the self-government itself. [...] The fact that the Naalakkersuisut itself chose to stay away from the citizens' meetings in February is probably the reason why they now have the bill for the upcoming citizens' meetings. (Sermitsiaq Aug. 21, 2021)

On Aug. 24, 2021, Greenland Minerals Ltd announced that the company will not participate in the second round of public meetings scheduled for 23-28 August 2021.

> See also: Greenland opens public consultation on bill banning uranium exploration and mining

Opponents hold protest outside public hearing on Kvanefjeld rare earths - uranium mine project at Narsaq: The citizens' meeting in Narsaq on Tuesday (Feb. 9) was held with loud protesters outside the town hall. Already half an hour before the start of the meeting, many protesters from Urani Naamik had gathered at the assembly hall in Narsaq to show their opposition to the mining project at Kuannersuit. About a hundred people were still standing outside the town hall as the approximately 100 chairs inside were filled up. Both inside and out, police officers had lined up to keep calm and order. (Sermitsiaq Feb. 10, 2021)

Greenland government not to participate in public hearings on Kvanefjeld rare earths - uranium mine project due to bomb threats: Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland] has received bomb threats in connection with consultation meetings about Kuannersuit. Therefore, the Naalakkersuisut will not attend consultation meetings in the first instance. The citizens' meetings are scheduled from 5 to 9 February. (Sermitsiaq Jan. 29, 2021)

NGO Urani Naamik calls practice of holding public meetings on Kvanefjeld rare earths - uranium mine project during COVID-19 shutdown undemocratic: The citizens' meetings for the Kuannersuit project have been moved 14 days until the 5th-9th February 2021. This is stated by the Ministry of Mineral Resources in a press release.
However, the postponed dates do not change the fact that due to a [COVID-19 pandemic related] ban on entry, it is still impossible for experts and stakeholders from other countries to attend the citizen meetings. (Sermitsiaq Jan. 18, 2021)

Greenland government starts consultation on proposed Kvanefjeld rare earths - uranium mine: On 17 December, the Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland] approved the initiation of the public consultation on the EIA [Environmental Impact Assessment] report and the SIA [Social Impact Assessment] report on Greenland Minerals A/S' rare earths project at Kuannersuit.
The consultation period will start on 18 December 2020 and end on 13 Sep 2021 (Consultation period extended). (Sermitsiaq Dec. 17, 2020 / Feb. 3, 2021 / May 27, 2021)
> Download: Consultation documents , Dec. 2020
The public meetings on the project, originally scheduled for Jan. 22 - 26, 2021, have been postponed to Feb. 5 - 9, 2021, due to the current situation with the COVID-19 pandemic. (Sermitsiaq Jan. 11, 2021)
Naalakkersuisut now has added two extra public meetings in Qaqortoq and Narsaq. (Sermitsiaq Feb. 3, 2021)
Due to restrictions imposed by the corona situation, as well as security risk and municipal elections, the Naalakkersuisut has decided to extend the consultation period for the mining project at Kuannersuit to 1 June. (Sermitsiaq Feb. 3, 2021)


Uranium remains significant factor for proposed Kvanefjeld mine: On July 9, 2020, Greenland Minerals Ltd made an announcement on the expected benefits of by-products obtained with rare earths [RE] mining at the Kvanefjeld deposit, including:
"The Kvanefjeld deposit contains a large low-grade uranium resource, of which a significant proportion is hosted within the main RE minerals. To produce a high-purity intermediate RE product it is necessary to remove the uranium via a uranium recovery circuit. The uranium will be recovered as uranium peroxide (UO4) and will meet the specifications set by uranium conversion facilities.
The annual cost of removing approximately 475 tpa of uranium is around US$5M. Uranium sales is estimated to be US$45Mpa [based on a uranium price of US$ 36.44 per lb U3O8], which represents a significant gross margin contributor."

Sheep farmers worried about impacts of proposed Kvanefjeld uranium mine: During the annual meeting in Qaqortoq, members of the Sheep Farmers' Joint Organization voted on the members' position on the extraction of uranium-containing soils. The vote showed that a large majority of members were opposed to the plans to launch the extraction of uranium-containing soils, members said in the letter to the association's executive board. (Sermitsiaq Apr. 26, 2020)

Operation of Kvanefjeld uranium mine to start with tailings management strategy left open?!: On 24 March 2020, Greenland Minerals Ltd made the following announcement regarding the tailings management for the proposed Kvanefjeld uranium mine:
"The method of tailings closure based on current technology is to close the tailings facility as a lake (wet closure). [...] As part of further investigations EAMRA [Greenland's Environmental Agency for Mineral Resource Activities] requested that a dry closure method be developed to the same level of detail to allow a direct comparison to the wet closure method.
Klohn Crippen Berger (KCB) were selected as an independent specialist consultancy to conduct this work. KCB developed a detailed dry closure design considering best available technology (BAT) to the same standard as the wet design, and subsequently conducted a trade-off study. The trade-off study concluded that the wet closure design has a lower environmental impact based on the criteria assessed by KCB. Significantly, due to the long projected life of the Kvanefjeld Project, EAMRA has deemed that a final decision on closure will be deferred to later in the operational phase, at which point any new technologies or considerations can be effectively applied." [emphasis added]

Government of Greenland rejects company's complaint about handling of EIA report for Kvanefjeld uranium mine: Back in April this year, the mining company Greenland Minerals made a serious criticism of the Environmental Protection Agency's handling of the EIA report for the Kvanefjeld project. The criticism is in every way unfounded, states a decision taken by the supreme authority in the field. It is Naalakkersuisut [Government of Greenland] who has dealt with the appeal as the supreme authority and the decision cannot be appealed to any other administrative authority. The decision states:
- Naalakkersuisut finds that Greenland Minerals (GML) complaint of April 4, 2019 is groundless and that GML has not provided any information that may justify any criticism of the Environment Agency for the Mineral Area.
- Naalakkersuisut requires GML to comply with the orders set by the Environment Agency for the Mineral Area in its decisions.
(Sermitsiaq Sep. 9, 2019)

Capital cost estimate for Kvanefjeld rare earth and uranium mine project reduced by 40%: On July 9, 2019, Greenland Minerals Ltd announced an updated capital cost estimate for the Kvanefjeld Project. The Project's capital cost estimate has been reduced by 40% from US$ 832 million to US$ 505 million. The reduction in the capital cost estimate is the result of optimisation studies covering all elements of the project from the flowsheet to civil construction.

Stability of tailings dam at proposed Kvanefjeld uranium mine unclear: There is no plan for the dam structures in the tailings depot in Taseq Lake. Thus, you do not really know the durability of the dam by, for example, an earthquake. This is the verdict from the professor of geology, which has gained access to the background documents for the preliminary EIA report for the Kuannersuit project via the environmental organization NOAH. (Sermitsiaq Apr. 28, 2019)

Demonstration against proposed Kvanefjeld uranium mine: On Apr. 26, 2019, about 75-80 adults and a couple of children held a demonstration in Narsaq to show their opposition to a possible future mining operation on the Kvanefjeld. (Sermitsiaq Apr. 26, 2019)

Formation of joint venture with CNNC for processing of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium minerals raises concern that Greenlandic uranium may end up with Chinese military: One cannot rule out that Greenlandic uranium can be used for military purposes. Therefore, one should ask a number of questions before screwing any contract together [...], says Professor Jørgen Delman from the Department of Cross-Cultural Affairs, who is an expert in Chinese matters. (Sermitsiaq Feb. 1, 2019)

Joint venture formed for processing of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium minerals in China: On Jan. 23, 2019, Greenland Minerals Ltd (GML) announced that Shenghe Resources Holding Co Ltd (Shenghe) GML's largest shareholder has formed a joint venture company with subsidiaries of China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), to create China Nuclear Hua Sheng Mining Ltd (Hua Sheng), in which Shenghe will hold a 45% interest. Hua Sheng will be the designated agent for Shenghe for the import, export and trading of rare earth materials and products that carry radionuclides, common constituents of rare earth rich minerals and concentrates.
On August 21, 2018, GML entered a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Shenghe that encompasses the offtake of total output of rare earth elements from Kvanefjeld in either chemical or mineral concentrate.

Updated Environmental Impact Assessment lodged for Kvanefjeld uranium project: On Sep. 3, 2018, Greenland Minerals Ltd announced that it has lodged an updated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report for the Kvanefjeld uranium project with the Greenland Government. The EIA will be reviewed in parallel to undergoing translation to Greenlandic and Danish in preparation for a public consultation period.

Kvanefjeld Mining Project endangers UNESCO World Heritage Site, opponents claim: "The UNESCO world heritage site at Kujataa is located too close to the uranium/REE mining project at Kvanefjeld and should be put on the World Heritage Convention's danger list until all plans for mining at Kvanefjeld are abandoned."
> View NOAH release Aug. 8, 2018

Demonstration against uranium mining in Greenland: On May 15, 2018, about 50 people held a demonstration in Narsaq to protest against the coalition government's uranium policy. (Sermitsiaq May 16, 2018)

UN Special Rapporteur has concerns on public involvement for Kvanefjeld rare earth/uranium mine project: The United Nations Special Rapporteur on human rights and hazardous substances and wastes, Baskut Tuncak visited Denmark and Greenland on 2-13 October 2017:

"Mining activities
[...] Despite this positive starting point, the task of informing communities and organizing discussions around especially complex topics is inherently challenging. Attention should be given to the time offered for discussion (currently comments can be submitted within 45 days, but this deadline might be too difficult to meet considering complexities and challenges in mobilizing civil society in remote locations), challenges in translating technical concepts to Greenlandic language, and to the need to reach directly remote communities as the internet might not be the sufficient channel for them.
Particular concerns exists with regard to the prospects of opening a mine for rare earth elements, zinc and uranium in Kvanefjeld, near Narsaq, considering the proximity of this mine to local settlements and the use of some neighboring areas for sheep farms. However, the assessment process for this project is still underway."
> View: UN Special Rapporteur's News release · End-of-visit statement , Oct. 13, 2017

Kvanefjeld uranium mine project obtains first approval: On behalf of Greenland, the Danish Maritime Authority has approved GME's statement on maritime safety in connection with the Kvanefjeld project.
With the approval, the first of three important studies was approved in connection with the consultation and investigation of the impact of the mining project in this area. The other two statements are EIA and VSB, ie explanations for the impact the project has on the environment and the locals. The report on safety at sea in the mining project consists, among other things, in clarifying the safest and most environmentally friendly methods of transporting freight to and from the mine area. (KNR Oct. 15, 2017)

Newly listed World Heritage in the shadow of proposed Kvanefjeld uranium mine: Five areas in South Greenland, which have been farming for 1,000 years, were admitted to UNESCO's prestigious World Heritage List. South Greenland is rich in minerals, but no mining operations may take place in areas on the UNESCO list. The World Heritage Committee has no doubt that South Greenland is worthy to be listed, but until the very decision taken on Sunday, July 9, in the Polish cultural city of Krakow, Greenland was faced with critical questions about the future interaction between World Heritage and Mining.
The World Heritage Committee would like, among other things, to study the popular protest and environmental consequences of a uranium deposit at Kvanefjeld, which is not far from Qassiarsuk - one of the five subdivisions [of the Kujataa World Heritage ], says Anja Jochimsen of the Department of Culture, Education, Research and Church. (Sermitsiaq July 31, 2017)

NGOs release withheld EIA draft report for Kvanefjeld mining project: "The Kvanefjeld project does not meet the environmental requirements of Greenland's Mineral Resources Act", says Niels Henrik Hooge from NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark's Uranium Group. "The EIA draft report raises more questions than it answers. It does not ensure that environmental risks are assessed and reduced as much as is practically possible. Chapter 13 of this Act is very clear: GMEL must apply the best available techniques, which is not the case, when both the concentrator tailings and the chemical tailings from the refinery are disposed of in Lake Taseq high up in the Narsaq valley river system. From here, radioactive isotopes and toxic chemicals will enter the groundwater, rivers, fiords and the sea. [...]"
> Download: NOAH press release Mar. 10, 2017 (143k PDF)
> Download: Greenland Mineral and Energy Limited Kvanefjeld Project, Environmental Impact Assessment, Draft, October 2015 (9MB PDF)
> Download: Comments on: Kvanefjeld Project. Environmental Impact Assessment, Greenland Mineral and Energy Limited, Draft, October 2015 , prepared by Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen, MSc, 22 Jan. 2017 (776kB PDF)

Greenland regulator rejects medias' request to access Environmental Impact Assessment for Kvanefjeld uranium project: The requests of [radio] DR and [newspaper] AG, who last fall were seeking access to the previously submitted EIA materials - environmental assessment of the project - have namely just been refused by the Environmental Protection Agency of Mineral Resources. AG will now appeal the decision to the Environmental Protection Agency for Mineral Resources. (Sermitsiaq Mar. 8, 2017)

Environmental Impact Assessment for Kvanefjeld uranium project still being withheld from public: Citizens still have to wait for specific knowledge about the environmental impact of mining uraniferous ore at Kvanefjeld at Narsaq. The draft of the so-called EIA assessment of the project has been played back and forth between the raw material department and the company for many months now, while the final deadline for submission is postponed again and again.
And although, according to the law, access should be given to documents that go in and out of the self government, this rule apparently has been temporarily suspended. (Sermitsiaq Jan. 11, 2017)

Company is blocking access to Environmental Impact Assessment for Kvanefjeld uranium project
(Sermitsiaq Oct. 26, 2016)
[It appears the company is eager to get a Hall-of-Infamy page of its own on our website as soon as possible...]

Company refuses to disclose documents on Chinese company's option to acquire majority share in Kvanefjeld uranium project, because it has no confidence in the government's ability to keep secrets (!): Greenland Minerals and Energy refused to disclose the agreement with Shenghe to the Raw Materials Department. The Department requested the agreement, after it emerged that Shenghe has secured an option to bid for 60% of the Kvanefjeld project.
GME director John Mair states also that a major reason he will not disclose the agreement is that he does not trust that the department can keep it secret. - We have little confidence in the Greenlandic government's ability to preserve and protect the confidentiality of documents which, pursuant Australian law, must remain private and confidential between GME and Shenghe. (Sermitsiaq Oct. 13, 2016)
[It's interesting to note that the company believes it can behave like this, while still awaiting a mining license from the same government...]

Chinese rare earth company to acquire 12.5% stake in owner of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium mine project, with option up to 60%: On Sep. 23, 2016, Greenland Minerals and Energy announced that Shenghe Resources Holding Co. Ltd is to acquire a 12.5% interest in the company, subject to shareholder and Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) approval being obtained prior to November 30th, 2016.
According to Politiken (Sep. 27, 2016), the Chinese company has also acquired an option to purchase up to 60 percent of the shares at a later date if the mine becomes reality. This option is not mentioned by Greenland Minerals and Energy, but only in a stock exchange disclosure of Shenghe Resources.
> Download: Shenghe Resources Holding Co. Ltd announcement Sep. 23, 2016 (315k PDF - in Chinese)
[Ehm - wasn't independence from the Chinese rare earth producers one of the initial incentives for the project?]

Greenlandic Broadcasting Corporation KNR fires uranium-critical journalist: Kalaallit Nunaata Radioa (Greenlandic Broadcasting Corporation) has fired journalist Søren Lyberth for displaying a 'Uran Naamik' (Uranium No) sticker while conducting interviews at the anti-uranium demonstration held on April 8. (Sermitsiaq May 19, 2016)

Inuit Association ICC publishes report criticising lack of citizen involvement with Kvanefjeld uranium mine project:
> Download: 'Ajorpoq' - vi får ingen svar! "Bedre borgerinddragelse om Kuannersuit" , by Mia Olsen Siegstad and Mads Fægteborg, December 2015 (5.2MB PDF - in Danish)

Demonstrations at eight locations in Greenland against mining of uranium: On Apr. 8, 2016, demonstrations against the mining of uranium were held at several places in the country. (Sermitsiaq Apr. 8, 2016)
Demonstrations were held in eight towns: in Nuuk, Ilulissat (about 50 people), Qaqortoq (about 50 people), Narsaq, Narsarsuaq (about 50 people), among others. (Sermitsiaq Apr. 9, 2016)

Feasibility Study update announced for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project: On Apr. 6, 2016, Greenland Minerals and Energy announced that it has completed an update to its feasibility study, incorporating several modifications "which significantly improve the Project's financial outcomes".

Hearing confirms criticism of uranium mining in Greenland and need for referendum, NGOs conclude: At the initiative of Aaja Chemnitz Larsen (Inuit Ataqatigiit), Danish Parliament held a hearing on Wednesday (Mar. 16) on the possible extraction of radioactive substances in southern Greenland.
The organizations Avataq, the Association Urani Naamik in Narsaq, Nuuk Fjord Friends, The Ecological Council in Denmark, Noah Friends of the Earth Denmark and Renewable Energy believe that the consultation confirms Greenlandic and Danish environmental organizations' criticism of uranium mining, and think at the same time that the consultation underlines the need for a referendum in Greenland reintroducing the uranium ban. (Sermitsiaq Mar. 19, 2016)
> View video of hearing (in Danish)

Permitting phase begins for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium mine project: On Nov. 25, 2015, Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited announced that the Greenland Government has approved the public pre-hearing White Paper, and Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Kvanefjeld project.
> Access project documents (Government of Greenland)
> Download Amended Terms of Reference for Environmental Impact Assessment , Oct. 2015 (3.5MB PDF - English version)
> Download Terms of Reference for the Social Impact Assessment , Oct. 2015 (2.0MB PDF - English version)
> Download White Paper with Responses to Questions Put Forward During the Pre-Hearing Period , Oct. 2015 (492k PDF - English version)

Environmental groups criticize planned lake disposal of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project tailings: The organizations Avataq, Urani Naamik / Nej Til Uran, VedvarendeEnergi and the Ecological Council, do not believe that the mining company Greenland Minerals & Energy (GME) uranium and rare earth mining project in Kuannersuit near Narsaq is justifiable. This applies especially to the mining company plans to deposit millions of tons of so-called tailings waste that is radioactive in Taseq Lake. Such a solution would not be a possibility if Greenland was an EU country, as it would be contrary to the Union's environmental regulations, argue critics. (Sermitsiaq Aug. 14, 2015)

Positive Feasibility Study announced for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project: On May 25, 2015, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced that it has completed a Feasibility Study for the development of the Kvanefjeld Multi-Element Project. The Study 'Base Case' evaluates the development of a mine, mineral concentrator, a refinery and supporting infrastructure located in Greenland treating 3.0 Mt/annum of ore to extract rare earth elements (REEs), uranium and zinc.

Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd signs new Memorandum of Understanding with Chinese partner NFC on development of Kvanefjeld Project: On April 7, 2015, Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited (GMEL) announced that a second Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed with China Non-Ferrous Metal Industry's Foreign Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. (NFC).
Under the terms of the new MoU GMEL will be responsible for finalising the exploitation license application and commencing the permitting process. In addition, GMEL will complete pilot plant operations in the coming months that will provide further confidence and rigour to the proposed process flow sheet. NFC will provide assistance to GMEL in preparing the exploitation license application, and both parties will cooperate in identifying and completing further work programs required for the Project to reach bankable status.

Demonstration in Copenhagen against uranium mining in Greenland: On Friday afternoon (Aug. 1) Danish time about 100 people participated in an announced demonstration against uranium mining in Greenland. (Sermitsiaq Aug. 1, 2014)

Plan for overseas refinery of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium concentrates abandoned: On July 22, 2014, Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited (GMEL) announced that "based on the support from NFC and the advice from the local key stakeholders GMEL considers that the most suitable location for the hydrometallurgical refinery is in Greenland, adjacent to the mine and concentrator. Consequently this scenario has been selected as the basis for the Feasibility Study and the Terms of Reference for the EIA and SIA (approved in 2011) will be updated to reflect this."

Refining of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium concentrates to take place in China: On Mar. 24, 2014, Greenland Minerals and Energy Limited (GMEL) announced that it has signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with China Non-Ferrous Metal Industry's Foreign Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. (NFC). "The MoU sets out a framework for both parties to cooperate in aligning the rare earth concentrates from GMEL's Kvanefjeld Project, with NFC's substantial rare earth separation experience and capacity, to create a powerful force in global rare earth supply. [...] NFC's participation in the rare earth industry comes through its subsidiary Guangdong Zhujiang Rare Earths Company [...]"

No more need for appeasements after lifting of zero-tolerance uranium policy: refinery for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project now planned in Greenland: If the company succeeds in attracting international investors to invest the 5.5 billion Danish Crowns [US$ 1 billion] in the construction of mine, ore concentrator, refinery and port in southern Greenland, it is realistic that the mine could start production in the first half of 2017, says Greenland Minerals & Energy director Rod McIllree. (Berlingske Nov. 5, 2013)

Proposed Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium mine to dump millions of tonnes of tailings in nearby lake: Lake Tasek is to receive 56 million tonnes of tailings from the proposed Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium mine, according to the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The tailings will still contain the thorium and half of the uranium initially present in the ore.
Chemical engineer Gert Asmund , who is a senior fellow at the University of Aarhus Department of Bioscience - Arctic Environment, says that it is impossible to isolate the tailings in order to prevent leakage and emissions: "It will rain down on the lake, and so there must be an overflow". (Ingeniøren Nov. 5, 2013)
[The 56 million tonnes figure is based on the obsolete 1983 Risø report (see below). The 2012 Prefeasibility Study (see below) assumed the mining of 232.6 million t of ore, resulting in approx. 230 million t of tailings. Given the deposit's total resource of 956 million t of ore, the amount of tailings can reach approx. 940 million t. This definitely exceeds the capacity of Lake Tasek, necessitating an additional tailings deposit of some sort.]

Company proposes to locate refinery for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project in Denmark: Greenland Mining and Energy recently proposed that the separation of uranium from rare earths could be made in Risø (Denmark). (Sermitsiaq Oct. 3, 2013)

Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium mine project only viable, if uranium is sold: "Is the project sustainable without export of uranium? No. I think that the project requires all revenue from the products that can be made from the different raw materials if it is to be internationally competitive," said Roderick McIllree, CEO of Greenland Mining and Energy (GME ). (Politiken Sep. 23, 2013)

Off-shore refinery under consideration for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project: On Feb. 28, 2013, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced that it is investigating the potential of establishing the refinery for its Kvanfjeld project outside of Greenland. The company is finalising a study for the establishment of a 3 million tonne per year mine and mineral concentrator in Greenland and expects to complete the studies for an off-shore refinery during 2013. The establishment of a refinery overseas will mean a smaller project footprint in Greenland.
On Mar. 26, 2013, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced the completion of a Mine and Concentrator Study. The mine and concentrator (flotation circuit) will produce a high-grade REE-uranium mineral concentrate, along with zinc (6,180 tpa) and fluorspar by-products (8,865 tpa). The REE-uranium mineral concentrate containing 14% total rare earth oxides (REO) and 0.24% uranium oxide (U3O8) will then be treated in a dedicated refinery to produce 23,000 tpa of high purity mixed rare earth hydroxide, and 1.1 Mlbs U3O8 (423 t U). The incremental cost of recovering the uranium is less than US$ 37/lb U3O8. Following expansion to 6 Mtpa the uranium unit production costs drop to less than US$ 31/lb U3O8.

Greenland Minerals obtains full ownership of Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project: On Aug. 6, 2012, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced that it has finalised an agreement with Westrip Holdings and Rimbal Pty Ltd to complete the acquisition for the outstanding 39% of the exploration license (EL 2010/02) that contains the Kvanefjeld, Sørensen and Zone 3 deposits, with an equity-based transaction.

Positive Prefeasibility Study announced for Kvanefjeld rare earth - uranium project: On May 4, 2012, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced that the "Kvanefjeld Prefeasibility Study confirms a long-life, cost competitive rare earth element - uranium project".

Greenland authorizes exploration of radioactive minerals at Kvanefjeld deposit: Greenland Minerals and Energy A/S has now been authorized to investigate radioactive elements, the company announced, after the Department of Business and Employment changed the conditions for exploration. Naalakkersuisut's [Government of Greenland] decision means that Greenland Minerals and Energy has been authorized to apply for a use permit, including radioactive minerals, says the company. The decision comes after Greenland Minerals and Energy has announced that the company can not complete the so-called feasibility studies of environmental, health, profitability and social impact without also including radioactive elements in the investigation.
In a press release the company acknowledges that the decision lies within the coalition Qoornoq agreement, which maintains the zero-tolerance policy. The decision means that Greenland Minerals and Energy A/S can continue its planned activities in Narsaq in 2012 and 2013. (Sermitsiaq Dec. 1, 2011)

"Terms of Reference" approved for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessments on the Kvanefjeld project: On Aug. 2, 2011, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced that the Greenland government has approved the "Terms of Reference" (ToR) for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessments on the Kvanefjeld project.
> Download: ToR for Environmental Impact Assessment, Kvanefjeld Multi-Element Project , July 2011 (2MB PDF)
> Download: ToR for Social Impact Assessment, Kvanefjeld Multi-Element Project , June 2011 (726kB PDF)

Former Greenland premier becomes chairman of mining company that plans to extract uranium in Greenland: Former Greenland premier Lars-Emil Johansen is new chairman of the Australian mining company Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd that will extract rare earth metals in Kvanefjeld. This mining is only possible with uranium by-product extraction. (Sermitsiaq avis July 2, 2009)

Greenland issues first exploration license for uranium as an accompanying mineral: On Dec. 14, 2010, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced "that it has received approval by the government of Greenland to fully evaluate the Kvanefjeld multi-element project, inclusive of radioactive elements (uranium). The permit has been issued in accordance with the recent amendment to the standard terms for exploration licenses in Greenland that creates a framework for the evaluation of mineral deposits that include uranium amongst other economic elements."

On Feb. 1, 2010, Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd announced the receipt of positive interim pre-feasibility report for the Kvanefjeld rare earth/uranium deposit.

A Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for the Kvanefjeld deposit is on-schedule for completion late in the third quarter, 2009. (Greenland Minerals and Energy June 19, 2009)

On Jan. 29, 2009, the Association for opponents of the mining of uranium-bearing minerals at Kvanefjeld was founded. Kalistat Lund was appointed president. (Sermitsiaq avis Jan. 30, 2009)

> Download: Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement for the Kvanefjeld Uranium Mine , by Kim Pilegaard, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, Risø-M-2875, September 1990, 138 p. (3.3MB PDF)
[This report was prepared in 1983 as part of the documentation for the Kvanefjeld Uranium Project funded by the Danish Ministry of Commerce. It covers a mining and milling operation solely for uranium.]

HOME   WISE Uranium Project   >   Mining & Milling   >   New Uranium Mining Projects - Europe   >   Issues   >