Issues at Operating Uranium Mines and Mills - Wyoming, USA 
(last updated 10 May 2013)
Site Index
Christensen Ranch ·
Highland (Cameco Resources) ·
Irigaray ·
Moore Ranch ·
Smith Ranch ·
Sweetwater ·
Willow Creek
> See also Issues for:
New Mining Projects ·
Decommissioning Projects ·
Legislation & Regulations
> See also Data for:
Deposits, Proposed and Active Mines ·
Old Mines and Decommissioning
(formerly Christensen Ranch / Irigaray)
> View deposit info
> see also decommissioning issues
> View NRC page
Wyoming DEQ authorizes operation of Unit 10A Well Field at Christensen Ranch uranium in situ leach mine
On Feb. 8, 2013, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality authorized Uranium One to commence lixiviant injection in the Unit 10A Well Field at the Willow Creek (Christensen Ranch) Mine.
Wyoming DEQ authorizes operation of Unit 8 Well Field at Christensen Ranch uranium in situ leach mine
On Dec. 18, 2012, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality authorized Uranium One to commence lixiviant injection in the Unit 8 Well Field at the Willow Creek (Christensen Ranch) Mine.
NRC takes action in case of contamination incident in Canadian refinery caused by yellow cake shipped from Uranium One's in situ leach mine in Wyoming
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter documenting actions that Uranium One USA has agreed to take following an incident in Canada in which three workers were exposed to yellowcake from a drum shipped from a U.S. facility.
The incident occurred on June 23 at a uranium conversion facility in Blind River, Canada. When a worker loosened a ring clamp on a 55-gallon drum containing uranium oxide yellowcake the lid blew off, ejecting about 26 kilograms of the material into the air. The worker closest to the drum and two others in the area, who were not wearing respirators, were exposed to airborne uranium. Any adverse health effects to the workers would likely be caused by chemical, rather than radiological effects.
The barrel had been shipped from Uranium One's Willow Creek Facility in Wyoming to a Canadian conversion facility on May 29. Following this incident several other drums shipped to the Canadian facility containing yellowcake were found to be bulging from internal pressure.
The Canadian facility has stopped opening containers of yellowcake from Uranium One's Willow Creek facility until they can develop a plan to safely do so. The licensee has notified the NRC that it has suspended all shipping from the Willow Creek facility until it determines how the drums became pressurized.
Under the terms of the Confirmatory Action Letter, Uranium One has agreed to investigate the cause of the event; develop a course of action to ensure the safety of any other unopened drums containing yellowcake previously shipped from its Wyoming facility; and develop a corrective action plan to ensure the safety of continued storage, shipment or further processing of the yellowcake.
After similar events occurred at several facilities in 1998, corrective actions were adopted by the industry to prevent recurrence. Specifically, new procedures were adopted to ensure that drums containing yellowcake remained unsealed for at least three hours to ensure adequate cooling of the material.
(NRC release July 6, 2012 - emphasis added)
> Download Confirmatory Action Letter CAL 4-12-003, July 5, 2012
(PDF)
> Download Preliminary Notification PNO-IV-2012-005, July 5, 2012
(PDF)
On Dec. 4, 2012, NRC notified Uranium One, that "Based on an independent evaluation of the adequacy of corrective actions taken, the NRC has determined that the actions prescribed in CAL 4-12-003 have been met. Consequently, the NRC is closing the CAL, which will allow Uranium One to resume shipments of yellowcake product in accordance with the new packaging and transportation procedures."
> Download Preliminary Notification PNO-IV-2012-005A, December 4, 2012
(PDF)
> See also current issues Blind River Refinery (Ontario)
Commissioning phase at Willow Creek (ex Christensen Ranch) ISL uranium mine still ongoing after almost one year
Commissioning at the Willow Creek Project commenced in December 2010. Commissioning will be completed when a pre-defined operating level, based on the design of the plant, is maintained.
(Uranium One Inc. Nov. 7, 2011)
NRC begins special investigation of Willow Creek uranium in situ leach mine after aerial release of yellow cake powder
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission launched a "special investigation" today to determine if workers were exposed to "yellowcake" after an incident at Uranium One USA Inc.'s Irigaray and Christensen Ranch in-situ uranium mine in northeast Wyoming.
According to a NRC press release, the incident occurred on Sunday (Oct. 2). Two workers were in the vicinity of a "dryer" containing yellowcake - yellow uranium oxide powder - when they heard an alarm and the dryer automatically shut down.
The yellowcake dryer is located inside an enclosed building.
"It appears that a seal on the dryer may have broken, causing the yellowcake powder to escape," the NRC stated in the press release. "Current information indicates there were no major safety impacts or release to the environment as the dryer is housed inside a pressurized sealed room within a building."
NRC spokeswoman Lara Uselding told WyoFile that it appears the workers were wearing proper protective clothing to avoid exposure to the uranium material. To determine whether there was an exposure, air samples will be analyzed. Also, the workers underwent urinalysis testing.
"We got results back today, and uranium was non-detectable ... So they had no intake of uranium," Donna Wichers, Uranium One senior vice president of in-situ operations, told WyoFile in a phone interview on Wednesday (Oct. 5).
Wichers described the entire incident as a "non-event," and said the NRC inspector was scheduled to visit the mine anyway. She said once the NRC decided to launch a special investigation, part of the agency's protocol is to issue a press release, "Which we tried to talk them out of," Wichers said.
(WyoFile Oct. 5, 2011, emphasis added)
> Download NRC release Oct. 5, 2011
(PDF)
State issues Notice of Violation for spill of sodium chloride brine solution at Willow Creek uranium in situ leach mine
On Sep. 19, 2011, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued a Notice of Violation to Uranium One USA, Inc. for a spill of approx. 7,000-10,000 gallons of sodium chloride brine solution that occured "around August 4 or 5, 2011" but was reported only on August 19, 2011.
> Download Notice of Violation NOV #4900-11, Sep. 19, 2011
(PDF - WY DEQ)
> Download Notice of Compliance, Oct. 19, 2011
(PDF - WY DEQ)
NRC issues license renewal for Willow Creek (formerly Christensen Ranch / Irigaray) uranium in situ leach mine:
On March 7, 2013, NRC issued a 10-year license renewal for the Willow Creek uranium in situ leach mine.
> Federal Register Volume 78, Number 55 (Thursday, March 21, 2013) p. 17450-17451 (download full text
)
> Download: License SUA-1341, March 7, 2013
(1.1MB PDF)
> Downlad: Safety Evaluation Report, March 2013
(8.8MB PDF)
NRC issues Supplemental Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for license renewal with more than doubled flow rate:
> Federal Register Volume 78, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2013) p. 5514-5516 (download full text
)
"This supplemental environmental assessment addresses new information since the original environmental assessment for license renewal regarding the applicant's proposed change to increase the licensee's Christensen Ranch satellite plant throughput from 15,140 liters per minute (L/min) (4,000 gallons per minute (gpm)) to 34,070 L/min (9,000 gpm)."
> Download: Supplemental Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Renewal for Uranium One USA, Inc., Willow Creek Uranium In-Situ Recovery Project, Johnson and Campbell Counties, WY, License SUA-1341, January 2013
(147k PDF)
> Access Docket ID NRC-2009-0036
NRC issues Final Environmental Assessment for license renewal:
"CONCLUSION: The NRC staff concludes that the renewal of License SUA-1341, involving continued operation of the Irigaray and Christensen Ranch projects, would not significantly impact the environment."
> Federal Register: July 14, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 135) p. 41528-41529 (download full text
)
> Download Final Environmental Assessment, July 2011
(789k PDF)
Uranium One fined US$ 25,000 for missed sampling of 24 monitor wells at Willow Creek ISL uranium mine
Of 66 monitoring wells requiring sampling in the recently started Well Field Unit 7, sampling had been missed at least once in 24 wells for a total of 82 missed sampling events. Since the well field began operations, each well should have been sampled seven times over a period of 14 weeks, sampling being required on a biweekly basis. Five wells were never sampled while seven had only on sampling event missed.
In a settlement agreement of April 21, 2011, Uranium One agrees to pay a total penalty of US$ 25,000.
> Download Notice of Violation NOV #4831-11
, April 21, 2011 (PDF - WY DEQ)
> Download Settlement Agreement, May 2011
(PDF - WY DEQ)
> Download Termination of Notice of Violation
, Nov. 23, 2011 (PDF - WY DEQ)
Public comment invited on proposed additional deep disposal wells at Christensen Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
On Nov. 5, 2010, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality announced that it proposes to permit two additional deep disposal wells (in addition to the two existing ones) at Christensen Ranch.
The public is invited to comment on the draft permit until December 10, 2010.
> Download Public Notice
· Draft Permit 10-219
· Fact Sheet
(PDF - WY DEQ)
Transfer of ownership of the Christensen Ranch ISL mine to Atomredmetzoloto
Atomredmetzoloto can't export uranium mined in Wyoming
A Russian state-owned firm mining Wyoming uranium can't export what it mines and would need to meet stringent requirements before it could do so, the top U.S. nuclear regulator told Sen. John Barrasso in a letter released Monday (Mar. 28).
The written response from Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Gregory Jaczko came in response to a Barrasso letter to President Barack Obama in December.
The Wyoming Republican expressed "strong concerns" regarding NRC approval in November of the purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One Inc. by Russian state-owned firm ARMZ that month.
Russia helps with nuclear programs in countries unfriendly to the United States, Barrasso wrote.
Uranium One owns several permits to mine Wyoming uranium and operates processing facilities and mines in Johnson and Campbell counties.
In his response to Barrasso, Jaczko said ARMZ and Uranium One lack the export license needed to ship uranium out of the country.
"In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the export of uranium for use in reactor fuel," Jaczko wrote.
If the firm did request permission to export uranium, U.S. law would require Russia to certify that the uranium would be used only for peaceful purposes.
The law would also require Russia to suitably protect the nuclear fuel, not transfer it to a third country and not alter the form without U.S. consent.
If the firm did apply for an export license, that request would be made public, Jackzo wrote.
(Billings Gazette Mar. 28, 2011)
NRC approves transfer of ownership of the Christensen Ranch ISL mine to Atomredmetzoloto
On Nov. 23, 2010, NRC approved the change of control of the Christensen Ranch ISL mine from Uranium One Americas, Inc. to Atomredmetzoloto.
> Download NRC release Nov. 24, 2010
(PDF)
> Federal Register: December 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 234) p. 76050-76051 (download full text
)
NRC provides opportunity to request hearing and/or provide comments on the proposed transfer of ownership of the Christensen Ranch ISL mine to Atomredmetzoloto
Notice of Application From Uranium One USA, Inc., for Consent to
an Indirect Change of Control for Source Material License SUA-1341 to
JSC Atomredmetzoloto, Opportunity To Provide Comments and To Request a
Hearing:
Requests for a hearing must be filed by October 12, 2010.
Comments must be received by October 20, 2010.
> Download NRC release Sep. 20, 2010
(PDF)
> Federal Register: September 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 181) p. 57300-57302 (download full text
)
Christensen Ranch to become first Russian-owned uranium mine in the U.S.
If, as announced on June 8, 2010, Russian state-owned Atomredmetzoloto succeeds in becoming the majority shareholder of Uranium One Inc., Christensen Ranch will become the first Russian-owned uranium mine in the U.S. This change of control for the Christensen Ranch license will require NRC approval.
In addition, Uranium One's properties in the U.S. include, among others, the idle Shootaring Canyon uranium mill (Utah), and the proposed in situ leach uranium mines of Moore Ranch, Ludeman, and JAB/Antelope (all in Wyoming).
Uranium One plans to have new Wyoming ISL projects licensed as satellites to newly acquired Christensen Ranch / Irigaray mine
On Jan. 18, 2010, Uranium One notified the NRC that, in view of the acquisition of the Christensen Ranch / Irigaray mine, it plans to request the approval of its new ISL projects Ludeman, Allemand-Ross, and Moore Ranch as satellites to Christensen Ranch / Irigaray.
Uranium One acquires Christensen Ranch and Irigaray uranium in-situ leach mines
Acquisition of Christensen Ranch and Irigaray uranium in-situ leach mines by Uranium One Inc. completed:
Uranium One Inc.'s purchase of Cogema Mining, Inc. from Areva (Cogema Resources, Inc.) closed on January 25, 2010.
The name of Cogema Mining, Inc. will be changed to Uranium One USA, Inc.
NRC approves acquisition of Christensen Ranch and Irigaray uranium in-situ leach mines by Uranium One Inc.:
On Dec. 17, 2009, NRC issued an order providing consent to the change of control.
Federal Register: December 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 249) p. 69152-69153 (download full text
)
NRC provides opportunity to request a hearing concerning acquisition of Christensen Ranch and Irigaray uranium in-situ leach mines by Uranium One Inc.:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an
application submitted on September 18, 2009, by Cogema Mining, Inc.
(Cogema or the Applicant), requesting consent for an indirect change of
control with respect to its NRC Materials License SUA-1341. Under this
license, Cogema operates the Irigaray and Christensen Ranch in situ
leach (ISL) uranium milling facilities that are located in Johnson and
Campbell Counties, Wyoming. Cogema is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Cogema Resources, Inc. (Cogema Resources), which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Areva NC. Cogema Resources is planning to sell Cogema to
Uranium One Exploration U.S.A., Inc. (Uranium One), which, through
several subsidiaries, is wholly owned by Uranium One, Inc.
A request for a hearing must be filed by November 19, 2009.
Federal Register: October 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 209) p. 56241-56243 (download full text
)
Uranium One Inc. to acquire Christensen Ranch and Irigaray uranium in-situ leach mines:
On Aug. 10, 2009, Uranium One Inc. announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of the MALCO Joint Venture from wholly-owned subsidiaries of AREVA and EDF for US$ 35 million in cash.
The assets of MALCO include the licensed and permitted Irigaray ISR
central processing plant, the Christensen Ranch satellite ISR facility and
associated U3O8 resources located in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.
The Irigaray and Christensen Ranch facilities are expected to form the
basis of a new operating plan for the Company's projects in Wyoming. Uranium
One anticipates that its Moore Ranch project will now become a satellite ISR operation, with loaded resins being transported to Irigaray for further processing into dried U3O8. Uranium One's additional projects in the Powder River Basin, including Ludeman, Peterson, Allemand-Ross and Barge could also be developed as satellite operations with final processing through
Irigaray.
NRC staff finds no problem with groundwater impacts of existing in-situ leach uranium mines
> View here
U.S. NRC issues Notice of license renewal request for Christensen and Irigaray Ranch uranium in-situ leach facilities and opportunity to request a hearing
Notice of Request To Renew Source Materials License SUA-1341,
COGEMA Mining, Inc., Christensen and Irigaray Ranch Facilities, Johnson
and Campbell Counties, WY, and Opportunity To Request a Hearing
A request for a hearing must be filed by April 10, 2009.
Federal Register: February 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 25) p. 6436-6440 (download full text)
Christensen Ranch/Irigaray uranium ISL mines restarted without EPA approval
By letter dated Feb. 11, 2011, EPA notified Uranium One that a licence for evaporation and holding ponds is required according to 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart W, National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings.
"Resuming operation of the ponds is considered to be a modification, requiring that a modification approval application be submitted to EPA before the modification is planned to commence. We understand that the Christensen Ranch/Irigaray facilities have resumed operation. We have not received an approval application for the ponds onsite, as required by 40 CFR §61.07."
By letter dated Apr. 20, 2011, Uranium One contested the applicability of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart W to its in situ leach operations.
Production restarted at Christensen Ranch/Irigaray uranium ISL mines
Uranium One has started production at its Christensen Ranch uranium mine in southwest Campbell County, making it the first operating uranium mine in Campbell County in more than a decade.
Uranium One also has opened its Irigaray processing plant just across the border in Johnson County. The Irigaray plant now processes the uranium ore from the Christensen Ranch facility into yellowcake uranium.
(Gillette News Record Jan. 7, 2011)
NRC authorizes restart of Christensen Ranch/Irigaray uranium ISL mines
> Download NRC release Dec. 17, 2010
NRC issues Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for restart of Christensen Ranch/Irigaray uranium ISL mines
Federal Register: September 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 178) p. 53052 (download full text
)
> Download Environmental Assessment Sep. 2008
(ADAMS ML082110026)
The requested license amendment to revert from restoration and decommissioning status to operating status was issued by NRC on Sep. 30, 2008.
NRC issues Notice of license amendment request for restart of Christensen Ranch/Irigaray uranium ISL mines and opportunity to request a hearing
On March 6, 2008, NRC issued a Notice of License Amendment Request to revert to operating status from restoration and decommissioning status, COGEMA Mining, Inc., Christensen and Irigaray Ranch facilities, Johnson and Campbell
Counties, Wyoming, and Opportunity to Request a Hearing.
A request for a hearing must be filed by May 16, 2008.
Federal Register: March 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 52) p. 14279-14281 (download full text
)
COGEMA to restart Christensen Ranch in-situ leach uranium mine
With yellowcake cruising at $43 per pound on increased demand and dwindling worldwide stockpiles, COGEMA Mining Co. is now under strict orders from its international parent companies to get the Christensen Ranch in-situ leach uranium mine back on full production. "It's just a matter of a few -- six months -- before we're back in operation," said Mark Owens, who serves as manager of technical support for Mills-based COGEMA. In addition to putting its Christensen Ranch mine back on production, COGEMA is seeking to increase its uranium ore reserves in the state, according to Owens.
(Casper Star-Tribune May 22, 2006)
"Due to an increase in the uranium market price, mining is anticipated to resume at Christensen Ranch during year 2007. The final decision to resume mining is still pending the Joint Participation's approval, hopefully by the end of 2006 (The Joint Participation includes COGEMA Mining, Inc. as the operator and 71% owner, Malapai Resources Company as 29% owner; decisions must be unanimous).
Assuming that mining is resumed at Christensen Ranch, the first step will be continued well installation in the remainder of Mine Unit 7 (MU7). MU7 was about 50% installed when operations were shut down in year 2000. Drilling and well installation would resume in March 2007, followed by the initiation of surface construction (connection of wells to module buildings, connection to existing main trunkline to the plant). If schedules are adhered to, and all necessary approvals obtained, lixiviant injection could resume in MU7 as early as September 2007."
(COGEMA Mining, Inc., ANNUAL REPORT, PERMIT TO MINE NO. 478, August 19, 2005 through August 18, 2006)
On April 3, 2007, COGEMA Mining, Inc. requested an amendment of the license for its Irigaray/Christensen Ranch facilities to revert to an operating (uranium
production) status from the current restoration and decommissioning status.
"Christensen Ranch Project
All chemical addition to the mining wellfields ceased during February, 2000. Uranium
recovery was slowly phased out during the following months, with the last operating
wellfield shut down on June 23, 2000. Groundwater restoration is ongoing with active
restoration in two out of five Mine Units (#3 and 5). Residual uranium is removed at a
rate of approximately 50 lbs. per day during the Christensen restoration process.
Projected completion of groundwater restoration is in 2005, with final decommissioning
and surface reclamation to follow.
Irigaray Project
Mining ended in 1994. Groundwater restoration is ongoing with two Production Units (#
6 and 7) out of a total of nine Restoration has been completed in the other seven
Production Units. Residual uranium is removed at a rate of approximately 10 lbs. per
day during the Irigaray restoration process. Completion of groundwater restoration is
projected for late 2001, with wellfield decommissioning and surface reclamation to
follow. Decommissioning of most plant facilities will not begin until groundwater
restoration is completed at the Christensen Project and all recovered uranium is
processed."
(COGEMA Mining, Inc. letter to NRC dated September 7, 2000, available through ADAMS
)
COGEMA plans to cease production in all of its well fields of its Christensen Ranch / Irigaray in-situ leach site in Wyoming sometime during the third or fourth calender quarters of 2000.
All well fields will be in the restoration phase after production ceases. COGEMA's proposes to submit a decommissioning plan to NRC by April 30, 2000. It is anticipated that upon completion of the mining it will require a number of years to conclude the ground water restoration efforts in all impacted well fields.
(NRC letter to Cogema dated Nov. 29, 1999, available through ADAMS
)
Cogema received permission to inject brines from its Christensen Ranch in-situ leaching site in Wyoming in deep aquifers that might be a source of future drinking water supply. The brines consist of operational bleed streams from commercial in-situ leaching uranium mining operations as well as fluids from the restoration of the aquifer in mined out sections of the Christensen Ranch site. The exemption is necessary, since aquifer fluids contain less than 3,000 mg/l Total Dissolved Solids (TDS).
> See notice in Federal Register, March 26, 1999 (Vol. 64, No. 58), p. 14799-14804 (download full notice
)
> See also Federal Register, August 27, 1998 (Vol. 63, No. 166), p. 45810-45812 (download full notice
)
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Finding of No Significant Impact for the proposed license renewal of Cogema's Irigaray and Christensen Ranch in-situ leach uranium mines in Wyoming.
> See notice in Federal Register, June 26, 1998 (Vol. 63, No. 123), p. 34942-34944 (download full notice
).
The License violations reported for the Christensen Ranch facility are not mentioned in this Federal Register notice.
See also: Lists of Spills and Excursions for COMIN, Dec. 17, 2009
(ADAMS Acc. No. ML093640215)
According to Cogema's "Quarterly Progress Report of Monitor Wells on Excursion Status" of Oct. 2, 2000 (available through ADAMS
), 7 monitor wells at Irigaray remained on excursion status during the third quarter of 2000. The wells have been on excursion status for more than one year and up to 11 years. One other monitor well has been removed from excursion status.
Latest NRC Event Reports referring to Uranium One's Willow Creek (ex Christensen Ranch / Irigaray) ISL site in Wyoming:
- Mar. 7, 2013: Evaporation pond leak
- Mar. 5, 2013: "potential leaks" at two evaporation ponds
- Feb. 11, 2013: 2,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Dec. 23, 2012: 800 gallon spill of injection fluid (< 0.4 ppm U)
- Dec. 22, 2012: 950 gallon spill of disposal well fluid (2.1 ppm U)
- Dec. 9, 2012: 1,500 gallon spill of injection fluid (< 0.4 ppm U)
- Oct. 12, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Sep. 10, 2012: spill of injection fluid from unplugged historic drillhole located near injection well
- Sep. 7, 2012: 1,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Jun. 30, 2012: 1,500 gallon spill of injection fluid (0.9 ppm U)
- Jun. 18, 2012: 1,200 gallon spill of recovery fluid (7.5 ppm U)
- Jun. 18, 2012: 300 gallon spill of injection fluid (1.0 ppm U)
- Jun. 17, 2012: 500-700 gallon spill of injection fluid (1.4 ppm U)
- Apr. 20, 2012: 1,020 gallon spill of injection fluid (1.0 ppm U)
- Apr. 12, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Apr. 3, 2012: Two monitor wells placed on excursion status
- Mar. 29, 2012: Two monitor wells placed on excursion status
- Jan. 5, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Dec. 14, 2011: 1,500 gallon spill of RO brine fluid (3.8 mg/L U)
- Oct. 2, 2011: Aerial release of yellowcake powder
- Sep. 23, 2011: 4,000 gallon spill of injection fluid (0.87 mg/L U)
- Aug. 24, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- "around August 4 or 5, 2011": approx. 7,000-10,000 gallon spill of NaCl brine solution
- Jun. 21, 2011: 1,500 gallon spill of injection solution (3.5 ppm U)
- Apr. 19, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Apr. 12, 2011: Sampling missed for months at 24 monitoring wells, at least
- Mar. 29, 2011: 1,000 gallon spill of barren injection fluid
- Mar. 23, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Mar. 8, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jun 10, 2010: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jun 8, 2010: 1,200 gallon spill of permeate water
- Jun 3, 2010: Evaporation pond leak
- Dec 16, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Sep 15, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Mar 12, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Apr 17, 2008: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Mar 11, 2008: Two monitor wells placed on excursion status
- Sep 5, 2007: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Apr 25, 2007: Monitor well placed on excursion status
Find more events under decommissioning issues
- Jul 22, 2004: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Apr 28, 2004: Two leaks detected in evaporation ponds
- May 31, 2001: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jan 23, 2001: 13,392 Gallon spill of restoration water
- Aug 10, 2000: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Oct 28, 1999: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Oct 5, 1999: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jul 8, 1999: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- May 8, 1999: 15,000 Gallon Mining Injection Solution Spill
- Apr 12, 1999: 32,400 Gallon Injection Solution Spill
- Apr 3, 1999: 13,000 Gallon Spill of Restoration Water
- Mar 29, 1999: 23,520 Gallon Mining Injection Solution Spill
- Mar 26, 1999: 60,918 Gallon Mining Injection Solution Spill
- Feb 17, 1999: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Dec 22, 1998: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Nov 19, 1998: Monitor well placed in excursion status
- Sep 2, 1998: Shallow monitor well is in an excursion status
- Aug 6, 1998: Ground water monitor well placed in excursion status
- Jul 22, 1998: Minor leakage of byproduct solution from the evaporation pond
- Jul 8, 1998: 28,000 Gallons of water containing low level of U3O8 spilled onto ground
- Mar 5, 1998: Perimeter monitor well in excursion status
- Oct 3, 1997: Monitor well in excursion status
- Sep 16, 1997: Spilled 2,440 gallons of waste water containing 78.5 ppm natural uranium
- Sep 12, 1997: Well in excursion
- May 16, 1997: Two perimeter monitoring wells in excursion status
- Mar 12, 1997: Perimeter well in excursion status
- Dec 31, 1996: Perimeter well in excursion status
(details on post-Nov.1,1999, events available through ADAMS
, Docket No. 04008502)
> For reports on many more spills, download WY DEQ's spill databases
!
> View deposit info
> Cameco Resources (formerly Power Resources, Inc.)
> See also: Highland ISL decommissioning issues
> See also: Smith Ranch
State regulator issues Notice of Violation for deficiencies resulting in excursion at Cameco's Highland in situ leach uranium mine
The Notice of Violation is the result of a lack of operational controls to control
wellfield mining fluids resulting in an excursion outside of the aquifer exemption boundary. These violations were identified during the June 2011 Land Quality Division (LQD) Inspection.
> Download: Notice of Violation, March 5, 2013: WY DEQ LQD
· NRC ADAMS
(PDF)
Uranium company appealing Wyoming DEQ decision:
State environmental regulators and a uranium company are at odds over whether the company allowed precursors of uranium contamination to seep into test water wells near their field.
The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality served Cameco Resources with a violation notice in early March. Agency officials and Cameco are in discussions about the notice.
The violation occurred after data indicated a split in a well casing, according to Robin Jones, land quality supervisor for DEQ District 1. The state says faulty equipment contributed to the spread of lixiviant, a solution used to leach uranium from the ground.
But officials with Cameco question the state's judgment in calling what happened a violation.
"We believe it was issued prematurely," company spokesman Ken Vaughn said. "We conducted tests, including the installation of an adjacent test well, which indicated there was no lateral movement of mining solution in the area."
(Casper Star-Tribune Apr. 22, 2013)
Many compliance concerns identified during inspection of Cameco's Highland / Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
> View here
Reopening of Cameco's Highland processing plant for resin stripping
Cameco presents plan for Phase I of the Highland Plant Renovation:
Cameco Resources (Cameco) has initiated planning to increase U3O8 (yellowcake)
production capacity of the Wyoming and Nebraska In-Situ Recovery (ISR) mines.
Included in this plan is the need to receive toll shipments from various NRC licensed
facilities to elute their resin in addition to Cameco's own satellite facilities. The loaded resin is to be shipped from each NRC licensed processing operation to the Highland facility for resin stripping and barren resin return to originator. The demolition portion of the plan is a two phase approach to achieve the goal; Phase I, Project Infrastructure Installation and Up-Grade; Phase 2, Plant Building Interior Demolition, and Phase 3 [!?], the Highland Dryer Demolition.
This plan, Phase 1, includes the re-habilitation of the Highland Processing Plant from
the existing standby condition, modernization of the building services, and installation a Contractor support facility consisting of office trailer utilities and a new electrical substation.
(Phase I of the Highland Plant Renovation
, Cameco Sep. 15, 2011)
Numerous deficiencies identified during inspection of abandoned drill holes at Cameco's Highland / Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
> View here
State regulator requests investigation of possible impacts of long-term excursion at Cameco Highland in situ leach uranium mine
In a "Letter of Conference and Conciliation" dated May 17, 2011, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Land Quality Division requested Cameco Resources (CR) to perform additional groundwater monitoring in the aftermath of an excursion at monitor well CM-32 that was first reported on July 10, 2007:
"The Land Quality Division (LQD) has conducted a review of the records for Well-CM-32 which was on excursion from July 2007 through April 2011. During the review it was discovered that the location of CM-32 is within several hundred feet of the aquifer exemption boundary and the permit boundary. As a result of the injection of restoration fluid into the wellfield, subsequent to the onset of the excursion, there is concern that the lack of control of the excursion for almost four years may have caused fluid migration outside the exemption boundary." [...]
"CR is required to investigate the extent of the excursion beyond the monitor
well ring and the proximity to the aquifer exemption boundary and the permit boundary. A minimum of two monitor wells to investigate the extent of the excursion will be required."
> Download Wyoming DEQ Letter of Conference and Conciliation, Excursion at CM-32, May 17, 2011
(294k PDF)
Wyoming DEQ issues Notice of Violation to Cameco Resources for multiple failures at Highland ISL site; Cameco pays $13,000 fine
On Dec. 8, 2009, Wyoming DEQ issued a Notice of Violation to Cameco Resources for failure to report a monitor well excursion, among others, at the Highland ISL site.
In a settlement agreement, Cameco agreed to pay $13,000.
> Download Notice of Violation Dec. 8, 2009
(658k PDF)
> Download Settlement Agreement #4598-09, Jan. 27, 2010
(1.5M PDF)
NRC identifies irregularities with groundwater restoration at Mine Unit B of Cameco's Highland in situ leach uranium mine; Cameco pursues request for relaxed standards
"By letter dated June 26, 2009, Cameco submitted its Mine Unit B Ground Water Restoration Report for NRC approval. The report contained supporting data and related historical documentation leading to approval of the restoration by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) between 2004 and 2008.
During the acceptance review, staff observed that one monitor well appeared to remain on excursion status at the completion of groundwater restoration. Additionally, the staff identified that there appeared to be pumping activities at several perimeter and overlying monitor wells during the stability monitoring period that were not fully described in the report. By letter dated September 29, 2009, the staff did not accept it for a detailed technical review. Since that time, Cameco has re-evaluated the groundwater restoration data for Mine Unit B and has decided to pursue a request for alternate concentration limits (ACLs) in this mine unit to accompany the revised report."
> Download Public Meeting Summary
, Nov. 10, 2011
> Download Acceptance Review Mine Unit B Groundwater Restoration Completion Report
, September 29, 2009
> Download Mine Unit B Groundwater Restoration Report
, June 26, 2009
Wyoming DEQ issues Notice of Violation to Cameco Resources for failure to report excursion at Highland ISL site; Cameco pays $5000 fine
On Jan. 23, 2009, Wyoming DEQ issued a Notice of Violation to Cameco Resources for failure to report a solution excursion at the Highland ISL site: "an excursion was discovered by LQD in sampling data reported on September 4, 2008. The report indicated well CM-14 had exceeded all upper control limit parameters during that sampling event."
In a settlement agreement, Cameco agreed to pay $5000.
> Download WY DEQ Notice of Violation #4419-09
(329k PDF)
> Download Settlement Agreement #4419-09, March 9, 2009
(616k PDF)
Wyoming DEQ denounces poor environmental compliance at Smith Ranch/Highland in situ leach mine, issues Notice of Violation to PRI for failure to conduct concurrent reclamation
> View here
Cameco to restart Highland uranium recovery plant
On Dec. 4, 2007, Cameco announced that it is planning to restart its idle Highland uranium "mill" (i.e. the plant recovering the uranium from the pregnant solution produced by in situ-leach mining). The plant will be required to meet the proposed production increase at Cameco's Crow Butte and Smith Ranch-Highland in situ-leach facilities.
Wyoming DEQ issues Notice of Violation to PRI on major injection fluid spill at Highland ISL site
On Sep. 12, 2007, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued a Notice of Violation to Power Resources Inc. based on the 198,500 gallon [751 cubic meters] spill of injection fluid reported by PRI on June 22, 2007 to the Land Quality Division (LQD).
> Download WY DEQ Notice of Violation #4122-07 (PDF)
· Settlement Agreement (858k PDF)
On Nov. 7, 2000, Cameco announced the writedown of the Highland ISL property. Cameco plans to gradually reduce annual production to 300,000 pounds U3O8 (115 t U) by 2003, with the option of increasing production when prices warrant.
"Development activities at the Highland ISL uranium project in Wyoming will be suspended from 1 October, Power Resources International has announced. PRI also plans to scale production back from 700,000 pounds U3O8 (269 tU) in 2001 to 500,000 pounds U3O8 (192 tU) in 2002 and 300,000 pounds U3O8 (115 tU) in 2003. Current market conditions have been cited as the reason for the cutbacks, but PRI has the ability to ramp up production quickly should the market require." (UI News Briefing 00.39, Sep 27, 2000)
By letter dated July 13, 2000, Power Resources is requesting a license renewal for its Highland ISL project for 10 years. (details available through ADAMS
, Docket No. 04008857)
- Mar. 11, 2013: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Feb. 17, 2013: 105 gallon spill of production fluid (5.7 ppm U)
- Dec. 20, 2012: 1141 gallon spill of production fluid (23.1 ppm U)
- Aug. 8, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Aug. 1, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Mar. 10, 2012: 344 gallon spill of production fluid (4.1 ppm U)
- Mar. 9, 2012: 1202 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Mar. 7, 2012: 774 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Feb. 29, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jan. 12, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jun. 16, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jun. 7, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Mar. 8, 2011: Sampling missed for seven monitoring wells
- Mar. 8, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Sep. 10, 2010: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jun. 8, 2010: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jan. 29, 2010: 224 gallon spill of injection solutions (1.3 ppm U3O8)
- Jan. 13, 2010: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Nov. 23, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Sep. 24, 2009: Release of 90,600 gallons of treated process water
- July 31, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- July 7, 2009: Monitor well failure
- May 26, 2009: 5050 gallon spill of injection fluid (3 ppm U3O8)
- May 21, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- May 11, 2009: 6500 gallon spill of production solutions (19.8 ppm U3O8)
- Apr. 16, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Mar. 30, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Feb. 13, 2009: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Jan. 10, 2009: 1,820 gallon spill of injection/production water containing 15 ppm uranium
- Nov. 18, 2008: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Nov. 12, 2008: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- July 10, 2007: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- June 25, 2007: 3747 gallon spill of production fluid (21 ppm U)
- June 22, 2007: 198,500 gallon [751 cubic meters] spill of injection fluid (8.1 ppm U)
- May 21, 2007: 700 gallon spill of injection fluid (1.2 ppm U)
- May 1, 2007: monitor well on excursion status
- Dec. 30, 2005: 1000 gallon spill of restoration injection fluid, containing approx. 0.7 mg/L uranium
- Aug. 30, 2005: 1000 gallon spill of production fluid (15.4 mg/L U)
- May 17, 2005: 20,700 gallon spill of injection fluid, containing approx. 1.1 mg/L uranium
- Feb. 26, 2005: 3000 gallon spill of production fluid, containing 11.5 mg/L uranium
- Jan. 10, 2005: 300 gallon spill of injection fluid, containing 1 mg/L uranium
- Sep. 12, 2004: 1000 gallon spill of production fluid (10.5 mg/L uranium)
- May 3, 2004: 800-1000 gallon spill of production fluid, containing about 11 mg/L uranium
- Feb. 11, 2004: 400-600 gallon spill of injection fluid (1.3 mg/L U308)
- Feb. 8, 2004: 500-1000 gallon spill of injection fluid (1.1 mg/L U308)
- December 20, 2003: Spill of 600 gallons of injection fluid containing approx. 1.5 mg/L of uranium
- October 20, 2003: Spill of 2800 gallons of injection fluid containing approx. 1.5 mg/L of uranium
- September 29, 2003: Spill of 5000 gallons of injection/recirculation fluid containing approx. 2.0 mg/L of uranium
- March 13, 2003: Spill of approx. 1100 gallons of wellfield injection fluid
- November 7, 2002: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- July 1, 2002: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- March 21, 2002: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- July 7, 1999: Spillage of 3-5 Gallons of Water Containing LSA of Uranium Byproduct Material
- June 1, 1999: Spillage of 4000 Gallons of waste fluid
- Feb. 5, 1999: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Feb. 5, 1998: Monitor well placed on excursion status
> For reports on many more spills, download WY DEQ's spill databases
!
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Notice of
Violation to Power Resources, Inc., of Denver, Colorado, for
violations of NRC requirements at the Highland Uranium Project in Converse
County, Wyoming.
Power Resources, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cameco Corp.
> View Notice of Violation EA 97-218
> View deposit details
> See also: Cameco Resources Highland Uranium Project
> See also: North Butte / Ruth satellite facility
Wyoming DEQ inspection finds "potential for violations" at Cameco's Smith Ranch - Highland in situ leach uranium mine
"The inspection of the header houses in Wellfield F provided insight into the extent of the casing leak issues identified in the Administrative Order issued in August 2000. It became apparent during the inspection that not only were many wells identified with casing breaks and joint failures through the Administrative Order, but also, many pipelines and bell holes were affected with many infrastructure failures requiring replacements. This is a potential violation of the Noncoal Rules and Regulations [...].
There are numerous header houses in Wellfield F that indicate a bleed is not being maintained to control the fluids of the mining zone in many pattern areas. This is indicated where the header houses are stripped of pipes and connections to the wellfields. [...] A review of the excursion history in the wellfield indicates two confirmed excursions; one in 2002 and one in 2009. If these excursions were the result of failure to maintain the bleed in the wellfield, they could be perceived as violations of this regulation. [...]" [emphasis added]
> Download June 2012 Inspection Report
, July 28, 2012
License Renewal for Smith Ranch (Wyoming) in-situ leach site
On Sep. 19, 2012, NRC announced an Opportunity To Request a Hearing and To Petition for Leave To Intervene.
Requests for a hearing or leave to intervene must be filed by November 19, 2012.
> Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
p. 58181-58185 (download full text
)
> Access Docket ID NRC-2012-0214
By letter dated July 5, 2012, NRC accepted Cameco's revised license renewal application for review.
On June 15, 2012, NRC released Cameco's license renewal application for its Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine.
> Download license renewal application
Wyoming DEQ issues Notice of Violation to Cameco for deficienies identified at Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine - Cameco agrees to pay $20,000
"It was discovered that an improved road, two monitoring wells and a water supply pond were located outside the permit boundary in Section 7, T35N, R74W. The pond is not approved as a water supply pond in Permit 633. In addition, the monitoring wells were noted to have insufficient covers to prohibit the introduction of undesirable material."
> Download Notice of Violation, Docket No. 4998-12, May 18, 2012
(PDF - WY DEQ)
In a settlement agreement concluded on Nov. 1, 2012, Cameco agrees to submit an application to amend Permit 633 to include the off-site affected areas into the permit, among others. Cameco further agrees to pay US$ 20,000 "to fund a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) related to insitu uranium mining".
> Download Settlement Agreement, Docket No. 4998-12, Nov. 1, 2012
(PDF - WY DEQ)
Cameco requests exemption from groundwater restoration schedules at Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
By letter dated March 15, 2012
, Cameco requested from NRC an exemption from the requirement to complete groundwater restoration within 24 months, because "the imposition of such precise, prescriptive timeframes to groundwater restoration in aquifers that are part of natural systems is not practicable/reasonably achievable".
By letter dated June 22, 2012
, NRC refused to review the exemption request, since it is incomplete. NRC notes in particular the missing of a description of how the exemption would not endanger life, property, or common defense and security, and, how it would be in the public interest. NRC explicitly expresses its dissatisfaction with the progress of groundwater restoration at the Smith Ranch site:
- "[...] staff observes that despite years, and in some cases more than a decade of effort on groundwater restoration for mine units at the Smith Ranch facility, only one mine unit restoration has been approved by the NRC.
- The staff further notes that, with respect to the Smith Ranch facility, restoration has not proceeded in a timely way, equipment necessary for groundwater restoration has been removed from mine units before restoration has been completed, and restoration plans have not been submitted in a timely fashion.
- Further, past restoration actions at the Smith Ranch facility have been the subject of enforcement action by the State of Wyoming."
On May 30, 2012, Cameco Resources sent an Advanced Notification of Processing of Equivalent Feed to NRC. Cameco plans to perform bench tests with resins from "an industrial phosphoric acid circuit" at a pilot plant at Smith Ranch.
On Oct. 27, 2011, Cameco Resources' Safety and Environmental Review Panel (SERP) approved a test to determine if resins loaded with uranium from a phosphate
plant could be effectively stripped at the Smith Ranch-Highland Central Processing
Plant.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a summary RIS regarding equivalent feed in the Federal Register September 30, 2011 for comment. The test cannot take place until the RIS is approved and officially released by the NRC.
(Semi-Annual Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Report, July 1 through December 31, 2011, ADAMS Acc. No. ML12087A157)
Uranerz signs agreement with Cameco on processing of Nichols Ranch resin at Smith Ranch
On Nov. 30, 2011, Uranerz Energy Corporation announced that it has signed a processing agreement with Cameco Resources, a wholly-owned Wyoming subsidiary of Cameco Corporation.
Under the agreement, Uranerz will deliver uranium-loaded resin produced from the Company's Nichols Ranch in-situ recovery mining operations to Cameco's Smith Ranch Highland uranium mine for final processing into dried uranium concentrate packaged for shipping to a converter.
Many compliance concerns identified during inspection of Cameco's Highland / Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
"Through the April and June 2011 inspections of the permits, the LQD identified many compliance concerns with regard to drill hole and well abandonment, open and uncapped drill holes and wells, topsoil salvage and protection, erosion and sediment control, drilling without notification or approval of notification and compliance with the wellfield restoration schedule. Additional concerns identified through self-reporting of missed sampling events, failure to report a significant spill, abatement of spills and surety deficiencies has compounded the compliance issues from the inspections."
> Download June 2011 Inspection Report & Compliance Concerns - Cameco Resources, Permits 603 & 633
(Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Oct. 21, 2011)
Numerous violations identified during inspection of Cameco's Highland / Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
During an NRC inspection conducted on August 29 through September 1, 2011, three violations of NRC requirements were identified:
"The violations are related, a) to your failure to store byproduct waste bins within a restricted area, as required by a license condition, b) your failure to provide the NRC with copies of excursion and spill that had been reported to the State of Wyoming, as required by a license condition, and c) failure to have an alarm to notify wellfield operators that an exceedence had occurred, as required by the license application."
> Download NRC Inspection Report 040-08964/11-002 and Notice of Violation, Oct. 25, 2011
Numerous deficiencies identified during inspection of abandoned drill holes at Cameco's Highland / Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
During an inspection of abandoned drill holes conducted on April 20 and 21, 2011, at Cameco Resources Inc.'s Highland / Smith Ranch in situ leach mine site, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality identified several compliance issues which are recommended for enforcement actions. Among these are in particular (emphasis added):
- "There is a strong indication that the drilling mud used at CR is not of sufficient mud weight to sufficiently seal the drill holes. The drilling mud is falling back to significant depths below surface indicating the fluid is either going into the rock formations and/or groundwater at depths below the top of the drill fluid column. The fluid could be seeping out of the drill column at any elevation in the column, and there is no way to know where in the column it could be occurring. There is also potential that with the drill fluid seeping into multiple zones throughout the drill column that it is resulting in communication between aquifers. Finally, many of the inspected drill holes are located close to existing wellfields which may be developed into production areas. With a potentially low mud weight there is a chance that the drill mud in these holes will continue to flow into multiple aquifer zones as a result of pumping in the wellfields."
- "Significant deficiency in sediment and erosion control continues to be a very high concern for LQD at the SHRUP mine sites. The lack of sediment control in the Mine Unit 10 development areas and the lack of sediment controls associated with exploration/delineation drilling activities on and/or adjacent to the permit boundaries are a repeat violation that LQD has tried to impress upon the operator as a serious problem. The inspectors have encountered numerous instances of sediment on native areas as a result of mining related disturbances."
> Download: April 2011 Inspection Report, Cameco Resources, Permits 603 & 633
, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, June 13, 2011 (18.1MB PDF - ADAMS Acc. No. ML11173A106)
Cameco ordered to officially report spill at Smith Ranch in situ leach uranium mine
In a letter dated May 25, 2011, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality ordered Cameco to officially report a spill in mine unit K-North that Cameco had considered as not reportable.
Cameco study claims solubility type classification of yellow cake from in situ leaching is 100% "fast"
> View here
Wyoming DEQ invites comment on modified permit for deep disposal wells at Smith Ranch/Highland ISL mine
Power Resources, Inc., dba Cameco Resources located at the Smith Ranch-Highland Disposal Wellfield in Converse, Wyoming. This permit modifies an existing permit for seven Class 1 non-hazardous waste disposal wells. This modification is undertaken at the Administrator's initiative primarily to require a more relevant list of analytes and parameters for the quarterly injectate analyses. The financial assurance is clarified and other modifications are summarized in the Public Notice.
The public is invited to comment on this draft permit until March 17, 2011.
> Download Public Notice Feb. 15, 2011
(170k PDF) · Draft Permit 09-054
(514k PDF)
Cameco submits license renewal application for Smith Ranch-Highland uranium in situ leach mine
> Download license renewal application, Aug. 12, 2010
(ADAMS Acc. No. ML102360313)
On Jan. 19, 2011, NRC notified Cameco that "the staff is suspending its review of the LRA [license renewal application] and will provide PRI an opportunity to correctly address the groundwater restoration standards, timeliness in decommissioning requirements".
NRC cites Cameco for failure to decommission in-situ leach mine units at Smith Ranch in time
On Nov. 16, 2009, NRC cited Power Resources, Inc. for failure to decommission mine units within 24 months:
"[...] the licensee failed to complete decommissioning of Mine Units 1 and C within 24 months and failed to request an alternate decommissioning schedule. Specifically, the licensee began decommissioning of Mine Unit 1 during July 2006 and Mine Unit C during May 1999, both of which continue to be decommissioned, and the licensee had not requested an alternate decommissioning schedule until August 13, 2009."
> Download NRC inspection report and Notice of Violation, Nov. 16, 2009
(ADAMS Acc. No. ML093200711)
Cameco requests alternate schedules for completion of groundwater restoration up to 2025 at Smith Ranch ISL mine
On Aug. 13, 2009, Cameco Resources sent a Request for Alternate Schedule for Completion of Decommissioning (Groundwater Restoration) at its Smith Ranch - Highland site to NRC. Due to disposal water capacity limits, the completion of restoration at seven wellfields is expected to be delayed for several years, including up to the year 2025 in one case. (ADAMS Acc. No. ML092330083
)
State invites public comment on proposed license for deep disposal wells at Smith Ranch/Highland ISL mine
The State of Wyoming intends to issue an underground injection control permit for the disposal of non-hazardous industrial wastewater at the Smith Ranch/Highland ISL uranium mine.
The wells will inject industrial wastes, including uranium processing wastes, into the Tekla, Teapot and Parkman Formations. The wells covered by this permit inject at depths between 8,024 to 9,560 feet below ground surface. The injection volumes are limited to a maximum of 3,600 barrels per day per well representing a total maximum injection volume of 25,200 barrels (1,058,400 gallons = 4,006 cubic metres) per day.
Public comments on the proposed operation, the proposed groundwater classification, and the State's intent, are invited on or before September 8, 2009.
> Download DEQ Public Notice Aug. 2009
(PDF)
> Download Draft Permit August 2009
(PDF)
NRC staff finds no problem with groundwater impacts of existing in-situ leach uranium mines
> View here
NRC issues Notice of Violation to Cameco Resources for deficienies identified at Smith Ranch ISL mine
Based on the results of an unannounced inspection conducted on September 23-25, 2008, the NRC has determined that three Severity Level IV violations of NRC requirements occurred at the Smith Ranch facility.
The violations involve
- an exceedance of the public dose limit for radiation exposures in unrestricted areas,
- the failure to store byproduct materials in a restricted area,
- the failure to control and maintain constant surveillance of licensed material at a satellite facility.
> Download Inspection Report 040-08964/08-002 and Notice of Violation (Nov. 25, 2008)
(ADAMS ML083310300)
DEQ issues Notice of Violation to Cameco Resources for deficienies identified during abandoned drill hole inspection
- Drill holes were not properly abandoned
- Drill holes were not immediately capped following drilling
- Monitoring wells lacked a proper well cap and inadequate [?!?] surface seals
- Drill hole sites were not properly backfilled, contoured and seeded for surface restoration
- etc.
On Sep. 3, 2008, Cameco agreed to pay a $50,000 settlement.
> Download: Notice of Violation NOV #4314-08, July 17, 2008
(PDF) · alternate source 
> Download: Inspection Report, July 7, 2008
(PDF) · Photos
(4.3M PDF)
> Download: Settlement Agreement, Aug. 29, 2008
(PDF)
Cameco Resources requests license amendment for the processing of third-party resin at its Smith Ranch - Highland in-situ leach mine
On Sep. 15, 2009, NRC issued the requested License Amendment.
On Aug. 20, 2009, NRC issued a Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment for Receipt and Processing
of Third Party Ion Exchange Resin at the Smith Ranch - Highland in-situ leach mine.
Federal Register: August 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 160) p. 42129-42130 (download full text
)
On Aug. 12, 2009, NRC staff released its Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the processing of third-party resin at Cameco Resources' Smith Ranch - Highland in-situ leach mine. The EA contains a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
On July 23, 2008, NRC staff "determined that the application is not sufficiently complete, and is therefore unacceptable, for the purpose of conducting a detailed technical review.
The application is deficient because of the lack of an environmental analysis of the potential impacts of transportation of third-party resins to the SR-HUP for processing and subsequent return to the third party."
On June 19, 2008, Cameco Resources requested a license amendment for the processing of third-party resin at its Smith Ranch - Highland Uranium Project.
According to Cameco Resources, processing of resin from third parties will not exceed currently approved levels of activity in terms of pounds processed annually or flow rates for production solutions from wellfields.
Wyoming DEQ denounces poor environmental compliance at Smith Ranch/Highland in situ leach mine, issues Notice of Violation to PRI for failure to conduct concurrent reclamation
On March 10, 2008, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued a Notice of Violation to PRI for failure to conduct concurrent reclamation and to follow approved permits at the Smith Ranch/Highland in situ leach mine:
a. The permit indicates that "An updated schedule will be supplied with the
annual report if the mining or restoration schedule varies from Table 3-1."
The timetable commitments in the permit are not consistent with wellfield
status. Therefore, the table in the annual report is the schedule that PRI is
committed to for wellfield status. Based on this table, PRI is not in
compliance with their restoration schedules for Wellfields 2, 3, and 4/4A.
The annual report text indicates that Wellfield 2 will continue to be in
production, while the annual report schedule referred to in the permit
shows that it will be in restoration in 2008. Wellfields 3 and 4/4a should
be in restoration instead of production.
b. The permit states that it generally takes "three years for uranium
production, and three years for aquifer restoration." Actual times for
wellfield production and restoration are, thus far, 2-3 times longer than
permit commitments. [emphasis added]
The Notice of Violation is based on an investigation conducted in 2007. The Investigation Report, dated Nov. 21, 2007, also lists a number of further issues. Here some excerpts:
- The mine and reclamation plans contained in the permit document are out of date and incomplete in several important areas.
- PRI's typical wellfield installation procedures result in the near total disturbance of the native vegetation and soils. This is not consistent with the regulation that allows for "minor disturbance" without topsoil stripping.
- Over the years there have been an inordinate number of spills, leaks and other releases at this operation. Some 80 spills have been reported, in addition to numerous pond leaks, well casing failures and excursions. Unfortunately, it appears that such occurrences have become routine.
- The reclamation cost estimates contained in PRI's annual reports are based on a scenario that is totally infeasible and unsupported by any critical path timeline or water balance. Rough calculations based primarily on PRI's figures reveal an alarming scenario. A realistic reclamation cost estimate for this site would likely be on the order of $150 million, as compared to PRI's current calculation of $38,772,800. PRI is presently bonded for a total of only $38,416,500. No bond adjustments have been made since 2002. Clearly the public is not protected.
- PRI's environmental efforts have suffered from inadequate staffing, high
turnover, lack of institutional memory and a low level of corporate commitment. There has been a lack of continuity and follow-through on many issues. At this point in time, overall environmental compliance at this operation is poor.
On July 10, 2008, Cameco announced that a settlement agreement has been reached with the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. The agreement comprises several steps to accelerate restoration, and increases the bond for Smith Ranch and Highland to $ 80 million, among others.
Cameco agrees to pay a $900,000 penalty, $400,000 of which will be suspended, if Cameco satisfies the terms of the agreement. In addition, Cameco will pay $500,000 "to fund future, unspecified Supplemental Environmental Projects".
> Download Notice of Violation and Investigation Report, March 10, 2008
(NRC ADAMS Acc. No. ML080840311)
> Download NOV #4231-08 (PDF)
· Report of Investigation Nov. 21, 2007 (2.6M PDF)
(WY DEQ)
> Download Settlement Agreement July 8, 2008 (254k PDF)
(WY DEQ)
> See also PRI Highland decommissioning issues
NRC issues Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for in situ leach satellite facility at Smith Ranch
On Dec. 28, 2007, NRC issued an Environmental Assessment for the construction and operation of in situ leach satellite plant SR-2 at Smith Ranch. "On the basis of this EA, NRC has concluded that there are no significant environmental impacts and the licensing action does not warrant the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement."
Federal Register: January 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 5) p. 1367-1370
(download full text
)
> View docket NRC-2008-0011
(regulations.gov)
On Jan. 10, 2008, NRC issued the requested license amendment.
NRC issues Notice of Violation to PRI for appointment of unqualified radiation safety officer at Smith Ranch
On Dec. 11, 2007, NRC issued a Notice of Violation to PRI for the appointment of an individual to the position of radiation safety officer at Smith Ranch, although the individual did not possess the education or relevant experience requirements.
Cameco to increase production from Crow Butte and Smith Ranch-Highland by 70%
On Dec. 4, 2007, Cameco announced that it is targeting to increase the combined production at its Crow Butte and Smith Ranch-Highland in-situ leach operations by 70% to 4.6 million pounds U3O8 [1,769 t U] annually by 2011. The planned production increase requires the restart of the idle Highland uranium recovery plant.
Wyoming DEQ issues Notice of Violation to PRI on deep disposal well spill at Smith Ranch ISL site
On Nov. 28, 2007, The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued a Notice of Violation to Power Resources Inc. based on the deep disposal well spill reported by PRI on August 24, 2007 to the Land Quality Division (LQD).
> Download NOV #4164-07
(PDF) · Settlement Agreement
(PDF)
Uranium One Inc. concludes toll milling agreement with Power Resources Inc.
On Aug. 21, 2007, Uranium One Inc. announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement with Power Resources Inc. (PRI), the U.S. subsidiary of Cameco Corporation, whereby PRI will process uranium bearing ion exchange resins from Uranium One's owned and operated in situ recovery (ISR) projects in Wyoming.
Under the terms of the agreement, Uranium One will transport uranium bearing ion exchange resins from its uranium mining operations to PRI's Smith Ranch-Highland uranium facilities, or an alternate facility owned and operated by PRI or an affiliate of PRI located in the States of Wyoming or Nebraska, for processing and production of up to 1.4 million pounds [538 t U] per year of dried uranium concentrates. PRI must amend their operating licenses to accept uranium bearing resins from Uranium One. This amendment is subject to approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Initial Uranium One production is expected to be sourced from the Moore Ranch Project, located approximately 50 miles north of the Smith Ranch-Highland complex, with additional production expected to be sourced from the Allemand-Ross, Barge and Ludeman projects which are also located in close proximity to Smith Ranch-Highland.
Southwest area deep disposal well project
On Jan. 22, 2007, PRI submitted to Wyoming DEQ an application for a Southwest area deep disposal well.
This well will inject wastewater from an in-situ leaching uranium mine and other industrial wastes into the Lance Formation. The well covered by this permit injects at depths between 4,750 to 7,000 feet [1448 - 2134 m] below ground surface. The waste contains uranium residuals and significant amounts of Total Dissolved Solids and other contaminants.
The maximum injection pressure as measured at the wellhead is limited to 1,156 psi [79.7 bar] for SWA DW No. 1. The injection volumes are limited to 5,143 barrels [818 cubic metres] per day.
Public comments were due Oct. 1, 2007.
Reynolds Ranch ISL project to be included in Smith Ranch license
> See here
Smith Ranch acquired by Cameco
Cameco Corporation announced on June 19, 2002, that it has agreed, through its subsidiaries, to purchase the Smith Ranch uranium in situ leach (ISL) mine and various other ISL properties located in Wyoming from BHP Billiton’s subsidiary Rio Algom Mining LLC (Rio Algom).
The agreement is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to close within 45 days. (Cameco release June 19, 2002)
License Renewal for Smith Ranch (Wyoming) in-situ leach site
Federal Register: May 4, 2001, p. 22620-22622 (download full notice
):
"SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proposes to renew NRC Source Material License SUA-1548 to authorize the licensee, Rio Algom Mining Corporation (RAMC), to continue commercial operations of its in situ leach (ISL) Rio Algom Smith Ranch Uranium Recovery Project in Converse County, Wyoming. This license currently authorizes RAMC to receive, acquire, possess, and transfer uranium at the Rio Algom Smith Ranch Project, which is located approximately 17 miles (27 Kilometers)
Northeast of Glenrock, Wyoming. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was
performed by the NRC staff in support of its review of RAMC renewal
request, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 51. The
conclusion of the Environmental Assessment is a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the proposed licensing action."
- May 5, 2013: 55,000 gallon spill of injection fluid (2 ppm U)
- Mar. 12, 2013: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Feb. 19, 2013: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Oct. 20, 2012: 100 gallon spill of production fluid (31.1 ppm U)
- Oct. 16, 2012: 50 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Aug. 20, 2012: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Dec. 6, 2011: 1,779 gallon spill of injection fluid (0.7 ppm U3O8)
- Nov. 7, 2011: Leak in East Evaporation Pond
- Sep. 12, 2011: Monitor well placed on excursion status
- Aug. 19, 2011: 85 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Aug. 15, 2011: Leak in East Evaporation Pond (158 mg/L U)
- July 22, 2011: 53 gallon spill of injection fluid
- July 8, 2011: 1,190 gallon spill of restoration recovery fluid containing 2.4 ppm U3O8
- June 13, 2011: Leak in East Evaporation Pond (248 mg/L U)
- May 19, 2011: 790 gallon spill of solution containing 17 ppm U-nat, spill length 2,112 feet (644 m), width 3 feet (0.9 m)
- May 3, 2011: 1,500 gallon spill of production fluid, impacting 12,077 square feet (1,122 m2)
- Sep. 10, 2010: 960 gallon spill of solution containing 1.5 ppm U3O8
- Jul. 20, 2010: leak in East Storage Pond
- Jul. 8, 2010: 1,440 gallon spill of injection fluid containing 1 ppm U3O8
- Nov. 19, 2009: 560 gallon spill of injection solutions containing 1.4 ppm U3O8
- Aug. 26, 2009: 1,500 gallon spill of injection solutions containing 1.1 ppm U3O8
- Jun. 11, 2009: 190 gallon spill of injection solutions containing 0.7 ppm U3O8
- Apr. 23, 2009: leak in East Storage Pond (510 ppm U3O8)
- Feb. 27, 2009: leak in East Storage Pond (263 ppm U3O8)
- Feb. 9, 2009: 14,600 gallon spill of production solutions containing 7 ppm U3O8
- Jan. 9, 2009: 2,169 gallon spill of production solutions containing 11 ppm U3O8
- Dec. 29, 2008: 1,144 gallon spill of injection fluid containing 0.2 ppm uranium
- Oct. 30, 2008: 5,500 gallon spill of injection fluid containing 2 ppm uranium
- Sep. 17, 2008: 16,774 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Aug. 17, 2008: 7,965 gallon spill of injection fluid containing 1.4 ppm uranium
- July 24, 2008: 2,887 gallon spill of production water and 12,770 gallon spill of solution
- Aug. 23, 2007: 11,600 gallon spill of deep disposal well fluid
- June 27, 2007: 900 gallon spill of injection fluid containing 1.1 ppm uranium
- June 19, 2007: 900 gallon spill of fluid containing 41.2 ppm uranium
- Feb. 19, 2007: 6,000 gallon spill of production fluid (32.5 ppm uranium)
- Jan. 14, 2007: 5,000 gallon spill of injection fluid (2 ppm uranium)
- Dec. 13, 2006: 560 gallon spill of injection fluid (2 ppm uranium)
- Dec. 5, 2006: 10,000 gallon spill of mixed monitor well, restoration and waste fluids (1 ppm uranium)
- Nov. 22, 2006: 2,100 gallon spill of mine waste water
- Feb. 10, 2006: 1,000 gallon spill of production fluid, containing approx. 21 mg/L uranium
- Jan. 9, 2006: 6,240 gallon spill of injection fluid, containing approx. 1.7 mg/L uranium
- Oct. 21, 2005: 7,041 gallon spill of deep disposal well fluid
- Oct. 21, 2005: Leak detected in evaporation pond
- Sep. 2, 2005: 4,500 gallon spill of production fluid, containing approx. 8.6 mg/L uranium
- Aug. 16, 2005: 1,050 gallon spill of production fluid, containing approx. 2.1 mg/L uranium
- May 31, 2005: 4,700 gallon spill of injection fluid, containing approx. 1.1 mg/L uranium
- Oct. 9, 2004: 5,000 gallon spill of ground water sweep fluids containing 7 mg/L uranium
- Sep. 29, 2004: 2,000 gallon spill of injection fluid, containing 1.6 mg/L uranium
- Sep. 8, 2004: wellfield excursion at Mine Unit 4 monitoring well
- Sep. 6, 2004: 1,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
- July 22, 2004: 2,700-5000 gallon spill of production fluid
- Oct. 15, 2003: 5,000 gallon spill of injection fluid containing about 47 mg/L of U3O8
- Sep. 29, 2003: 5,000 gallon spill of injection fluid containing about 2 mg/L of U3O8
- Sep. 6, 2003: 20,800 gallon spill of injection fluid containing about 1.1 mg/L of uranium
- Feb. 9, 2003: 500 gallon spill of production fluid containing about 2 mg/L of uranium
- Jul. 30, 2002: 1,480 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Apr. 25, 2002: 3,500 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Apr. 24, 2002: 18,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Jan. 4, 2002: 1,800 gallon spill of production fluid containing about 18 ppm U308
- Dec. 5, 2001: 3,600 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Oct. 22, 2001: 62,400 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Jun. 18, 2001: 1,100 gallon spill of deep well disposal fluid
- Nov. 22, 2000: 1,870 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Oct. 22, 2000: 11,100 gallon spill of injection fluid
- Aug. 7, 2000: 780 gallon spill of production fluid
- Feb. 26, 2000: 3,780 gallon spill of production fluid
- Jan. 17, 2000: 6,900 gallon spill of production fluid
- Dec. 31, 1999: 3,000 gallon spill of injection fluid
(details available through ADAMS
, Docket No. 04008964)
> For reports on many more spills, download WY DEQ's spill databases
!
Commercial operations have started at Rio Algom's Smith Ranch, Wyoming, in situ leach project on 20th June, 1997. [UI News Briefing 97/26]
Moore Ranch (ISL), Campbell County
> View deposit data
Development of Moore Ranch uranium in situ leach mine suspended - six months after receiving license
"As we discussed, development activities at the Moore Ranch ISR Project were
temporally suspended in April 2011, to focus company and contractor resources on development activities at the Willow Creek Project. No construction activities have been undertaken at the Moore Ranch site. Activities undertaken at the site during the first six months of 2011 were limited to well drilling and completion of the perimeter ring monitoring wells, underlying monitoring wells, overlying monitoring wells and baseline restoration wells in the Wellfield #2 area."
(Uranium One letter to NRC, Aug. 31, 2011
)
Wyoming DEQ invites public comment on draft permit for deep disposal wells at Moore Ranch uranium in situ leach mine
Draft Permit 08-314 - Moore Ranch DW # 1,2,3,4 UIC Class I non-hazardous waste disposal wells. This facility is for four (4) proposed wells. Applicant: Uranium One Americas, Inc.; Location: Campbell County, T41-42N, R75W. The public is invited to comment on the draft permit until January 29, 2011.
> Download Public Notice Dec. 30, 2010
(PDF - WY DEQ)
> Download Draft Permit 08-314
(PDF - WY DEQ)
> Download Fact Sheet
(PDF - WY DEQ)
NRC approves transfer of ownership of the Moore Ranch ISL mine to Atomredmetzoloto
On Nov. 23, 2010, NRC approved the change of control of the Moore Ranch ISL mine from Uranium One Americas, Inc. to Atomredmetzoloto.
> Download NRC release Nov. 24, 2010
(PDF)
> Federal Register: December 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 234) p. 76050-76051 (download full text
)
> View older issues
> View deposit info
Kennecott requests another 5-year postponement of initiation of decommissioning of Sweetwater uranium mill
By letter dated June 1, 2011, Kennecott for the fourth time in a row requested a 5-year postponement of initiation of decommissioning of the Sweetwater uranium mill in Wyoming. The Sweetwater mill facility was shut down and has been under care and maintenance (stand-by status) since April 1983.
By letter dated Oct. 4, 2011, NRC staff notified Kennecott that it has determined that a fourth 5-year postponement should be granted.
Kennecott performing restart evaluation of Sweetwater mill; mill for sale again
On March 20, 2008, Kennecott Uranium Co. notified NRC of its intended applications for license amendments. Kennecott considers the construction of a resin elution facility at the site, and, it is currently performing a restart evaluation of the mill, which might involve several modifications requiring license amendments. Moreover, Kennecott said that the mill is for sale.
Kennecott denied right to store alternate feed material on site without license amendment
"In its letter, KUC makes several arguments in support of its position that it should be allowed to store the WTIX resin onsite without first being granted a license amendment to do so. If it is later authorized to resume its milling operations, KUC intends to process the WTIX resin as alternate feed material and dispose the resultant 11e.(2) byproduct material in its onsite tailings cell.
As discussed below, because the resin is not natural ore already present at the site, and because KUC is not presently authorized to conduct milling, the requested action requires a license amendment."
(NRC letter to Kennecott, November 30, 2007, ADAMS Accession No. ML072400149
)
Kennecott wants to store alternate feed material on site of currently idle Sweetwater mill for later processing
"Kennecott Uranium Company (KUC) wishes to store a small volume (approximately 8,000 cubic feet [227 cubic metres]) of ion exchange resin loaded with uranium at the Sweetwater Uranium Project beginning in September 2007. These loaded resins contain 1% to 3% natural uranium. These resins would be stored until such time as licensed operations are resumed at the site, at which point they would be eluted (processed), the uranium removed from them, precipitated as yellowcake and the yellowcake product dried and sold. [...] KUC believes that these materials can be stored on site without the need for a license amendment pending resumption of operations pursuant to NRC-approved license modifications [...]"
(Kennecott letter to NRC dated June 10, 2007 - ADAMS Accession No. ML071660298
)
Sweetwater uranium mill no longer for sale
SXR Uranium One Inc. had been selected by Rio Tinto Energy America, Inc. ("RTEA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, as the preferred bidder for RTEA's Sweetwater Uranium Mill and associated Green Mountain uranium properties located in south-central Wyoming. (SXR July 10, 2006)
On Jan. 8, 2007, however, sxr Uranium One Inc. announced that Rio Tinto Energy America, Inc. has decided to withdraw the Sweetwater uranium mill and related properties from sale in order to re-evaluate whether these should be retained and developed.
Kennecott requests another 5-year postponement of initiation of decommissioning of Sweetwater uranium mill
By letter dated June 7, 2006, Kennecott for the third time requested a 5-year postponement of initiation of decommissioning of the Sweetwater uranium mill in Wyoming. The Sweetwater mill facility was shut down and has been under care and maintenance (stand-by status) since April 1983.
On Sep. 25, 2006, NRC staff has determined that a third five-year postponement should be granted. In its review, NRC staff determined that this postponement is not detrimental to public health and the environment and is in the public interest, as discussed below. Furthermore, a letter from NRC staff to the National Mining Association dated February 16, 1996, stated that there is no limit to the number of extensions that can be granted.
Miracles of dose calculation: Sweetwater uranium mill reduces dose to nearest resident below background
Kennecott calculates the semiannual dose to the nearest resident for the second half of 2005 at 449.28 mrem [4.4928 mSv] (mainly based on radon inhalation and external gamma exposure), while the background dose was determined in 1994 at 569.9 mrem [5.699 mSv].
Kennecott concludes: "The net (dose to the nearest resident minus background dose) annual TEDE from the licensed operations for the second half of 2005 is 0 mrem/year, which is below the 100 mrem/year [1 mSv/year] dose limit to members of the general public."
More precisely, Kennecott should have stated that, based on its calculations, the licensed operations reduce the semiannual dose to the nearest resident by 120.62 mrem [1.2062 mSv]. But, apparently, this appeared inappropriate to Kennecott?
Source: Kennecott Uranium Company, Sweetwater Uranium Project: Airborne Effluents – 2005 Semiannual 10 CFR 40.65 Report, Source Material License SUA-1350, 27 February 2006
Catchment basin reclamation
NRC releases Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for catchment basin reclamation at Sweetwater uranium mill
Federal Register: May 23, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 98) p. 29543-29544
(download full text
)
The requested license renewal was issued on May 26, 2005.
NRC issues Draft Environmental Assessment for catchment basin reclamation at Sweetwater uranium mill
On March 2, 2005, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Draft Environmental Assessment for the reclamation of the catchment basin at the idle Sweetwater uranium mill.
During mill operations (Feb. 1981 - April 1983), fluids from the mill's counter-current decantation and solvent extraction processes were discharged to a catchment basin located 305 meters west of the lined tailings impoundment. The catchment basin is approximately 42.7 meters square, and 3.7 meters deep. The basin sides were lined with concrete, while the bottom was unlined. Organics, metals, and radionuclides (byproduct material) have slowly migrated through the soil beneath the basin into the underlying Battle Spring Aquifer. Primary contaminants are diesel range organics (DRO), consistent with the kerosene used for solvent extraction, and radionuclides (Ra-226 and natural uranium (U-nat)).
Remediation will involve the excavation of soils exhibiting DRO concentrations in excess of 2,300 mg/kg (Wyoming Voluntary Remediation Program standard).
Kennecott expects to excavate approximately 91,747 cubic meters of petroleum contaminated soil including approximately 20,261 cubic meters of material containing Ra-226 in excess of the standards found in Criterion 6(6), 10 CFR 40, Appendix A. Contaminated soils will be transported to the existing tailings impoundment for disposal.
After completing the soil excavation program, contaminated ground water will be extracted and conveyed to the lined tailings impoundment.
NRC issues 10-year license renewal for idle Sweetwater uranium mill
By letter dated May 25, 2004, Kennecott Uranium Co. requested a 10-year renewal of the Source Material License for its Sweetwater Uranium Project.
The uranium mill is currently in standby mode.
On July 28, 2004, NRC issued a related Notice of opportunity for hearing.
Federal Register: July 28, 2004 (Vol. 69, No. 144) p. 45087-45088 (download full text
)
The requested license renewal was issued on May 26, 2005.
NRC approves another 5-year postponement of initiation of decommissioning in view of Bush's Energy Plan
By letter dated July 17, 2001, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the second time approved a 5-year postponement of initiation of decommissioning of the Sweetwater uranium mill in Wyoming. The Sweetwater mill facility was shut down and has been under care and maintenance (stand-by status) since April 1983. Excerpt from the NRC letter:
"The continued existence of the mill is in the public interest as it is one of only six uranium mills remaining in the United States and the only one remaining in Wyoming. There is renewed interest in the United States in nuclear power as clearly expressed in the National Energy Policy
of May 2001. Nuclear power plants have increased power output the past several years, several plants have recently renewed operating licenses for 20 years, and new facilities are being considered. In addition, statutes oblige the Secretary of Energy to encourage the use of domestic uranium. Maintaining the domestic capacity to provide the raw material for nuclear power is in the public interest."
Kennecott sole owner of Sweetwater mill
Until September 11, 2000, Crested Corp. / US Energy owned a 50% interest in the Green Mountain Mining Venture (GMMV), but sold their interest to Kennecott.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued an operating licence for the Sweetwater uranium mill in Wyoming. (U.S. Energy Aug 31, 1999)
See also:
Federal Register: August 12, 1999 (Vol. 64, No. 155), p. 44057-44059 (download full notice
):
"SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proposes to renew NRC Source Material License SUA-1350 to authorize the licensee,
Kennecott Uranium Company (KUC), to resume commercial milling
operations at the Sweetwater facility, and to approve the plan for future reclamation of the mill facility, existing and proposed new
tailings impoundment, and the proposed evaporation ponds, according to
the 1997 Reclamation Plan, as amended." [...]
> See also WY DEQ information
License violations at Sweetwater mill site
- Dec. 7, 2009: 9316.8 gallon spill of pumpback fluid
- Aug. 18, 2008: 18278.4 gallon spill of pumpback fluid